Impact of human population history on distributions of individual-level genetic distance

Table 6 Summaries of common ancestry profiles (CAPs) for four population pairs

Surui vs Karitiana n₁ = 14, n₂ = 12	Average	Standard deviation	Ht	Raggedness
Surui	0.430 (0.011)	0.017 (0.003)	0.492	0.106
Karitiana	0.475 (0.013)	0.016 (0.004)	0.553	0.148
Surui vs Karitiana	0.492 (0.096)	0.015 (0.004)		0.625
Surui and Karitiana	0.453 (0.015)	0.033 (0.007)	0.586	0.080
Burusho, Kalash n₁ = 25, n₂ = 25
Burusho	0.577 (0.008)	0.014 (0.002)	0.703	0.263
Kalash	0.599 (0.008)	0.013 (0.002)	0.732	0.277
Burusho vs Kalash	0.598 (0.008)	0.013 (0.002)		0.128
Burusho and Kalash	0.582 (0.009)	0.019 (0.002)	0.736	0.089
Pima, Mbuti n₁ = 16, n₂ = 15
Pima	0.513 (0.008)	0.014 (0.004)	0.603	0.097
Mbuti	0.611 (0.004)	0.012 (0.002)	0.739	0.163
Pima vs Mbuti	0.608 (0.004)	0.015 (0.003)		0.071
Pima and Mbuti	0.565 (0.025)	0.040 (0.015)	0.740	0.042
Papuan, Biaka n₁ = 33, n₂ = 17
Papuan	0.547 (0.008)	0.014 (0.002)	0.673	0.117
Biaka	0.614 (0.008)	0.016 (0.003)	0.759	0.086
Biaka vs Papuan	0.605 (0.009)	0.015 (0.003)		0.086
Biaka and Papuan	0.591 (0.014)	0.025 (0.007)	0.768	0.048

Surui/Karitiana (Rondonia, Brazil) and Burusho/Kalash (Pakistan) are pairs of geographically proximate populations. Pima (North America)/Mbuti (Central Africa) and Papuan (Oceania)/Biaka (Central Africa) are pairs of geographically distant populations. Standard deviations are included in parentheses. For the 'between' and 'overall' comparisons, focal individuals are always drawn from the first population (ie Surui, Burusho, Pima and Papuan, respectively). Short tandem repeat data drawn from Rosenberg et al. [4]

ISSN: 1479-7364