Table 3 Homogeneity of variance
| Â | Counts (row frequency) | Â | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cohort | rs10490924 Code = CNTL | Total | ||
| Â | GG | GT | TT | Â |
Boston | 101 | 71 | 26 | 198 |
| Â | 51.01% | 35.86% | 13.13% | 100.00% |
Columbia | 218 | 136 | 14 | 368 |
| Â | 59.24% | 36.96% | 3.80% | 100.00% |
Iowa | 230 | 117 | 13 | 360 |
| Â | 63.89% | 32.50% | 3.61% | 100.00% |
Melbourne | 277 | 145 | 16 | 438 |
| Â | 63.24% | 33.11% | 3.65% | 100.00% |
Utah | 62 | 39 | 0 | 101 |
| Â | 61.39% | 38.61% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
Total | 888 | 508 | 69 | 1,465 |
| Â | Counts (row frequency) | Â | ||
Cohort | rs403846 Code = CNTL | Total | ||
| Â | AA | AG | GG | Â |
Boston | 41 | 102 | 55 | 198 |
| Â | 20.71% | 51.52% | 27.78% | 100.00% |
Columbia | 32 | 164 | 165 | 361 |
| Â | 8.86% | 45.43% | 45.71% | 100.00% |
Iowa | 68 | 179 | 118 | 365 |
| Â | 18.63% | 49.04% | 32.33% | 100.00% |
Melbourne | 71 | 229 | 137 | 437 |
| Â | 16.25% | 52.40% | 31.35% | 100.00% |
Utah | 13 | 61 | 27 | 101 |
| Â | 12.87% | 60.40% | 26.73% | 100.00% |
Total | 225 | 735 | 502 | 1,462 |
| Â | Counts (row frequency) | Â | ||
Cohort | rs1409153 Code = CNTL | Total | ||
| Â | AA | AG | GG | Â |
Boston | 67 | 97 | 34 | 198 |
| Â | 33.84% | 48.99% | 17.17% | 100.00% |
Columbia | 177 | 161 | 29 | 367 |
| Â | 48.23% | 43.87% | 7.90% | 100.00% |
Iowa | 128 | 177 | 60 | 365 |
| Â | 35.07% | 48.49% | 16.44% | 100.00% |
Melbourne | 150 | 226 | 63 | 439 |
| Â | 34.17% | 51.48% | 14.35% | 100.00% |
Utah | 31 | 60 | 10 | 101 |
| Â | 30.69% | 59.41% | 9.90% | 100.00% |
Total | 553 | 721 | 196 | 1,470 |
| Â | Counts (row frequency) | Â | ||
Cohort | rs10922153 Code = CNTL | Total | ||
| Â | GG | GT | TT | Â |
Boston | 53 | 102 | 43 | 198 |
| Â | 26.77% | 51.52% | 21.72% | 100.00% |
Columbia | 55 | 181 | 122 | 358 |
| Â | 15.36% | 50.56% | 34.08% | 100.00% |
Iowa | 99 | 172 | 94 | 365 |
| Â | 27.12% | 47.12% | 25.75% | 100.00% |
Melbourne | 94 | 234 | 113 | 441 |
| Â | 21.32% | 53.06% | 25.62% | 100.00% |
Utah | 20 | 59 | 21 | 100 |
| Â | 20.00% | 59.00% | 21.00% | 100.00% |
Total | 321 | 748 | 393 | 1,462 |
| Â | Counts (row frequency) | Â | ||
Cohort | rs403846 Code = CNV | Total | ||
| Â | AA | AG | GG | Â |
Boston | 141 | 149 | 48 | 338 |
| Â | 41.72% | 44.08% | 14.20% | 100.00% |
Columbia | 148 | 255 | 116 | 519 |
| Â | 28.52% | 49.13% | 22.35% | 100.00% |
Iowa | 110 | 137 | 37 | 284 |
| Â | 38.73% | 48.24% | 13.03% | 100.00% |
Melbourne | 179 | 218 | 74 | 471 |
| Â | 38.00% | 46.28% | 15.71% | 100.00% |
Utah | 33 | 46 | 14 | 93 |
| Â | 35.48% | 49.46% | 15.05% | 100.00% |
Total | 611 | 805 | 289 | 1,705 |
| Â | Counts (row frequency) | Â | ||
Cohort | rs698859 Code = CNV | Total | ||
| Â | AA | AG | GG | Â |
Boston | 85 | 147 | 105 | 337 |
| Â | 25.22% | 43.62% | 31.16% | 100.00% |
Columbia | 78 | 238 | 205 | 521 |
| Â | 14.97% | 45.68% | 39.35% | 100.00% |
Iowa | 69 | 136 | 79 | 284 |
| Â | 24.30% | 47.89% | 27.82% | 100.00% |
Melbourne | 76 | 233 | 163 | 472 |
| Â | 16.10% | 49.36% | 34.53% | 100.00% |
Utah | 19 | 49 | 25 | 93 |
| Â | 20.43% | 52.69% | 26.88% | 100.00% |
Total | 327 | 803 | 577 | 1,707 |