Skip to main content

Table 1 Pairs of Bayenv runs compared

From: On the stability of the Bayenv method in assessing human SNP-environment associations

 

Hancock1

Hancock2

Blair1

Blair2

Blair3

Blair4

Blair5

LongBlair1

LongBlair2

LongBlair3

LongBlair4

LongBlair5

W/O_Sib1

W/O_Sib2

W/O_Sib3

W/O_Sib4

W/O_Sib5

Hancock1

                 

Hancock2

a

                

Blair1

 

a

               

Blair2

 

a

a

              

Blair3

 

a

a

a

             

Blair4

 

a

a

a

a

            

Blair5

 

a

a

a

a

a

           

LongBlair1

                 

LongBlair2

       

b

         

LongBlair3

       

b

b

        

LongBlair4

       

b

b

b

       

LongBlair5

       

b

b

b

b

      

W/O_Sib1

 

d

               

W/O_Sib2

 

d

          

c

    

W/O_Sib3

 

d

          

c

c

   

W/O_Sib4

 

d

          

c

c

c

  

W/O_Sib5

 

d

          

c

c

c

c

 
  1. Letters indicate the parts of Tables 2 and 3 in which results for the indicated comparisons are averaged and presented. In Table 2, letters a, b, c, and d also correspond to parts e, f, g, and h, respectively. Hancock1 refers to the original Climate file posted on the dbCline website and published in Hancock et al. [40]; Hancock2 refers to file Climate.2 posted on dbCline website in autumn 2012 that uses the appropriate MCMC burn-in (see ‘Methods’ section); Blair1-5 refer to our five separate runs using 100,000 MCMC iterations; LongBlair1-5 refer to our five separate runs using 500,000 MCMC iterations; W/O_Sib1-5 refer to our five runs using a modified data set excluding the Siberian populations.