From: On the stability of the Bayenv method in assessing human SNP-environment associations
 | .05 | .01 | .005 | .001 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) All populations (100,000 iterations) - Hancock2 vs. Blair1 | .05 | 0.55 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
.01 | 0.75 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.66 | |
 | .005 | 0.78 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.54 |
 | .001 | 0.83 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.24 |
(b) All populations (500,000 iterations) - LongBlair1 vs. LongBlair3 | .05 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.93 |
.01 | 0.88 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.78 | |
 | .005 | 0.91 | 0.65 | 0.46 | 0.67 |
 | .001 | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.37 |
(c) Without Siberia (150,000 iterations) - W/O_Sib1 vs. W/O_Sib3 | .05 | 0.60 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.92 |
.01 | 0.81 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.73 | |
 | .005 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 0.40 | 0.61 |
 | .001 | 0.90 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.30 |
(d) Without Siberia (150,000 iterations) vs. Hancock2 - Hancock2 vs. W/O_Sib1 | .05 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.80 |
.01 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.56 | |
 | .005 | 0.81 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.44 |
 | .001 | 0.87 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.20 |