Skip to main content

Table 5 Statistically significant correlations of gene expression levels with mutation counts

From: Correlation of gene expression and associated mutation profiles of APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, REV1, UNG, and FHIT with chemosensitivity of cancer cell lines to drug treatment

Gene

Mutation count

n

ρ

p

p adj

Cancer type

REV1

C>Kb

12

− 0.902

6.00 × 10−5

0.0114

Sarcoma

REV1

C>Ka

12

− 0.895

8.37 × 10−5

0.0114

Sarcoma

REV1

C>Tb

12

− 0.895

8.37 × 10−5

0.0114

Sarcoma

REV1

Any

12

− 0.881

0.0002

0.0114

Sarcoma

REV1

C>Ta

12

− 0.881

0.0002

0.0114

Sarcoma

REV1

C>Ga

12

− 0.867

0.0003

0.0119

Sarcoma

REV1

C>Gb

12

− 0.867

0.0003

0.0119

Sarcoma

UNG

C>Ka

17

− 0.816

6.45 × 10−5

0.0114

Melanoma

UNG

Any

17

− 0.799

0.0001

0.0114

Melanoma

UNG

C>Kb

17

− 0.797

0.0001

0.0114

Melanoma

UNG

C>Ga

17

− 0.787

0.0002

0.0118

Melanoma

UNG

C>Ta

17

− 0.779

0.0002

0.0119

Melanoma

UNG

C>Tb

17

− 0.777

0.0002

0.0119

Melanoma

UNG

C>Gb

17

− 0.738

0.0007

0.0308

Melanoma

  1. Shown are correlations of gene expression levels with overall mutation counts in the WES data with padj < 0.05. These p values were FDR adjusted for multiple comparisons that included 5 candidate genes, 17 cancer categories with ≥ 5 cell lines in each category having both WES and expression data, and 7 categories of mutation counts including C>T, C>G, and C>K on one or both genome strands, as well as overall single nucleotide variant counts (Ntests = 595). “>” indicates the direction of substitution change
  2. Any all types of nucleotide substitutions, K G or T, n sample size for correlation analysis, ρ Spearman correlation coefficient, p p value prior to FDR adjustment, p adj FDR-adjusted p value
  3. aMutation counts on the reference genome strand only
  4. bMutation counts on both genome strands