Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of study groups and analysis structure in this paper

From: A genome-wide association study of mitochondrial DNA copy number in two population-based cohorts

Cohort

Group

% female

Source of DNA

Age at DNA assay

Site of assay

Covariates in baseline model

Cell proportions source

Cell proportions included in sensitivity model

N (N [CC]) main analysis

N (N [CC]) by subgroups

Meta-analyses (MA) in which each group features

ALSPAC

Mothersa(antenatal)

100%

White cells or whole blood [phenol-chloroform extracted]

16–43 years

Bristol

Age, DNA concentration, PC1, PC2, sample type (white cell or whole blood)

Estimated for a subset from Illumina 450 k methylation data

Lymphocytes and neutrophils

5461 (546)

(All DNA sources)

2056 (245)

[Whole blood samples]

3405 (301)

[White cell samples]

MA1 [main] all mothers

MA2 [sensitivity] white cell mothers only

Childrenb

49%

Whole blood [salt-extracted]

6–9 years

Bristol

Age, sex, DNA concentration, PC1, PC2

Lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils

NA

2102 (80)

–

Neonatesb

44%

White cells [phenol-chloroform extracted]

0 years

Bristol

Sex, DNA concentration, PC1, PC2

Lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes

NA

3647 (606)

–

UKBS

Femalea

50%

White cells

[guanidine-chloroform extracted]

17–69 years

Newcastle

Age, PC1–PC4

Derived from full blood countsc

Lymphocytes and neutrophils

1338 (1138)

[Females only]

–

MA1 [main] females only

MA2 [sensitivity] females only

Male

NA

1333 (1122)

[Males]

–

  1. CC cell composition adjusted model
  2. aGroup used in the main meta-analyses
  3. bChildren and neonates in these secondary analyses are unrelated to each other at IBD > 0.125, but some are related to the ALSPAC mothers (see ‘Genotype data’ in the ‘Participants and methods’ section)
  4. cSee Nalls et al. [27]; Gieger et al. [46]