Skip to main content

Table 1 The comparison of outcomes in each hACE2 Tg mouse model to SARS-CoV infection

From: COVID-19 preclinical models: human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 transgenic mice

 

K18-hACE2 [66, 67]

AC70, AC22, and AC63 [59, 68]

HFH4-ACE2 [69]

Mouse ACE2 promoter-driven hACE2 Tg mice [70]

Promoter

Human K18 promoter

CAG promoter

Human HFH4 promoter

Mouse ACE2 promoter

Parental mice of zygotes

(C57BL/6J × SJL/J) F2

(C57BL/6J × C3H/HeJ) F1

(C3H × C57BL/6) F1

ICR

Viral strains

Urbani

Urbani

Urbani

PUMC01

TCID50aof SARS-CoV

1.6 × 104b

AC70: 103

AC22: 106

AC63: 106

7 × 104c

105

Mortality (%)

Line 1: 100

Line 2: 100

Line 3: 100

AC70: 100

AC22: 0

AC63: 0

100

0

Survival days (p.i.)

Line 1: 2–5

Line 2: 3–4

Line 3: 5–7

AC70: 4–8

AC22: n.a.d

AC63: n.a.

5–6

n.a.

  1. aTCID50 50% tissue culture infective dose
  2. bThe viral dosage used in the study, 2.3 × 104 plaque-forming units (PFU), was converted to the estimated TCID50 by the conversion TCID50 ≈ 0.7 PFU [71].
  3. cThe viral dosage used in the study, 105 PFU, was converted to the estimated TCID50 by the conversion TCID50 ≈ 0.7 PFU [71].
  4. dNot applicable