Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Primary Research
  • Open Access

The genetic structure of the Belgian population

  • 1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 5Email author
Human Genomics201812:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-018-0136-8

  • Received: 13 December 2017
  • Accepted: 23 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

National and international efforts like the 1000 Genomes Project are leading to increasing insights in the genetic structure of populations worldwide. Variation between different populations necessitates access to population-based genetic reference datasets. These data, which are important not only in clinical settings but also to potentiate future transitions towards a more personalized public health approach, are currently not available for the Belgian population.

Results

To obtain a representative genetic dataset of the Belgian population, participants in the 2013 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were invited to donate saliva samples for DNA analysis. DNA was isolated and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined using a genome-wide SNP array of around 300,000 sites, resulting in a high-quality dataset of 189 samples that was used for further analysis. A principal component analysis demonstrated the typical European genetic constitution of the Belgian population, as compared to other continents. Within Europe, the Belgian population could be clearly distinguished from other European populations. Furthermore, obvious signs from recent migration were found, mainly from Southern Europe and Africa, corresponding with migration trends from the past decades. Within Belgium, a small north-west to south-east gradient in genetic variability was noted, with differences between Flanders and Wallonia.

Conclusions

This is the first study on the genetic structure of the Belgian population and its regional variation. The Belgian genetic structure mirrors its geographic location in Europe with regional differences and clear signs of recent migration.

Keywords

  • Genetic variability
  • Population genomics
  • Public health genomics

Background

After the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, international efforts were initiated to map human genetic variation between populations. This variation has been described for 26 populations worldwide via the 1000 Genomes Project [1, 2]. While this is a valuable resource for studying global genetic variation, both the number of samples per population and the total number of populations studied are relatively low. To gain sufficient statistical power and avoid false positives/negatives due to unmatched control populations in genotype-phenotype association studies, population-based genetic reference data are required from more specific and extended populations [3]. To address this, population-based whole genome sequencing initiatives have been performed at the national level throughout Europe [47]. From these genetic population studies, it has become clear that there is a strong correlation between the geographical location and the genetic structure of different populations [8, 9], also at the more regional level (e.g., along a north-south axis in the Netherlands) [6, 7, 9, 10]. Currently, this genetic information is not available for the Belgian population.

Therefore, a population-based cross-sectional study, called BelPHG-21 (Belgian Public Health Genomics in the twenty-first century), was organized that aims at describing the genetic variability in the Belgian population and relating this variability to several indicators of health and disease to anticipate a future transition towards precision public health. To accomplish this, the BelPHG-21 study was organized in the context of the 2013 Belgian National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The NHIS is a population-based survey that has been periodically organized since 1997. It has the purpose to assess the health status and its distribution in the population and to describe the association of this health status with its main determinants [11].

Here, we report on the BelPHG-21 results related to the genetic structure of the Belgian population. By incorporating NHIS information about the study subject’s residence and parental country of birth, we demonstrate small but clear genetic differences between different regions and illustrate how the population’s genetic structure is shaped by recent migration waves.

Results

Factors determining consent for former NHIS participants to participate in the BelPHG-21 population genetic study

To study the genetic structure and variability in the Belgian population, a subset of participants from the most recent NHIS, conducted on 10,829 inhabitants in 2013 [12], was invited to donate saliva samples for DNA analysis (Fig. 1). From the invited subsample of 1468 individuals, 210 (14%) consented and submitted saliva samples for DNA analysis. Using the NHIS information related to demographics, education, employment, income, health behavior, lifestyle characteristics, physical and social environment, and wellbeing characteristics, we applied a predictive weighted binomial regression analysis to identify the factors that determined consent to participate in this study. This resulted in a model containing four variables (smoking behavior, education, age, and region of residence) (Table 1). The odds for consent were higher in non-smokers (and higher in former smokers than never smokers), higher age, and higher educational attainment. Furthermore, the likelihood for consent was also higher in the Flemish Region compared to the other regions.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

BelPHG-21 study flow chart, Belgium 2016

Table 1

Variables predicting consent, BelPHG-21 study, Belgium 2016

Variable

Parameter

OR

95% CI OR

Smoking habits (ref “Smoker”)

Former smoker

2.21

[1.38, 3.62]

Never smoker

1.38

[0.92, 2.15]

Age

Age (years)

1.02

[1.01, 1.02]

Residence (ref “Flanders”)

Brussels’ region

0.45

[0.24, 0.77]

Walloon region

0.58

[0.41, 0.80]

Education (ref “No diploma”)

Lower secondary

2.29

[1.38, 7.02]

Higher secondary

4.13

[2.12, 9.50]

Higher

6.66

[3.40, 15.44]

Not applicable

5.31

[2.25, 14.06]

A weighted binomial regression analysis to predict consent contained four variables (smoking habits, age, residence, and education). For each parameter, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI interval are given

DNA sampling from the Belgian population

DNA was extracted from saliva samples obtained from 210 consenting participants. Three of these samples contained insufficient saliva, while the DNA concentration of eight other samples was considered too low for downstream analysis (Fig. 1). From the remaining 199 samples, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at ± 300,000 sites were measured using the whole genome scanning Illumina HumanCytoSNP-12 microarray. Microarray results from 10 samples were excluded due to insufficient call rates (i.e., lower than 0.6), resulting in 189 samples that were used for further analysis. These samples were genotyped using the hg19 human genome build as a reference and variant allele frequencies were calculated for a total number of 261,079 SNPs for which genotyping information was available (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Belgium is composed of three different geographical regions: Flanders, Brussels, and Wallonia. The 189 samples that were used for analysis in this study were donated by volunteers in all three regions: 98 from Flanders, 62 from Wallonia, and 29 from Brussels (Fig. 2). These numbers are proportional to the population size of the respective regions with an overrepresentation from the Brussels region (15.3, 17.3, and 24.7 samples per million inhabitants for Flanders, Wallonia, and Brussels respectively) (Additional file 2: Table S2). This oversampling of the Brussels region is related to the way the NHIS was constructed [11]. Similarly, the distribution of these samples was relatively proportional to the population size from each of 10 provinces in Belgium with a variation from 11.3 to 26.7 samples per million inhabitants (Fig. 2 and Additional file 2: Table S2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

DNA sampling in the BelPHG-21 study, Belgium 2016. DNA was sampled and analyzed from 189 NHIS-2013 participants. The number of collected samples is indicated for the three regions and 10 provinces. Numbers between brackets indicate the number of samples collected from participants with a migration background. Main origins from migrants are indicated by the arrows. See Additional file 2: Table S2 for more details and province abbreviations

From the samples used for analysis, 35 (18.5%) were donated by an individual with non-Belgian roots (here defined as an individual whose mother and/or father was born outside Belgium, as registered in NHIS). These individuals mainly originated from neighboring countries (16), Southern Europe (7), and Africa (6). Proportionally, the highest numbers of non-Belgian samples were obtained from individuals living in Brussels (11/29 samples; 37.9%), followed by Wallonia (18/62; 29.0%), and Flanders (6/98; 6.1%) (Fig. 2). These numbers are representative for the current structure of Belgian population, with important migration waves in the past 50 years, mainly from Southern Europe and Northern Africa, and with the highest immigration numbers found in the Brussels region [13].

The Belgian population is a typical European population with genetic signals of recent migration from the African continent

We first compared the genetic structure of the Belgian population with other populations worldwide. To restrict this analysis to the most informative and independent SNPs, only SNPs located on autosomes with a minor allele frequency of at least 5%, less than 2% missing values, and a linkage disequilibrium lower than 0.2 were used for structural comparison. These filtering criteria resulted in a selection of 47,802 SNPs. These SNPs were used for a principal component (PC) analysis using continental population data (i.e., African, American, South Asian, East Asian, and European populations) from the 1000 Genomes Project [1, 2, 14]. The main variance was captured by the first four PCs (10.4%, Additional file 3: Figure S1a). Using the first two PCs, which capture 5.2 and 3.2% of the total variance respectively, an expected and clear separation was observed between the different continental populations, with the largest differences between African, East Asian, and European populations (Fig. 3). By applying this PC model on the Belgian SNP genotype data, 184/189 samples were perfectly mapped on the European population. The remaining five samples were mapped towards or on the African population, and for four of these samples, an African origin was indeed confirmed in the NHIS data (Fig. 3 and Additional file 3: Figure S1b). These findings show that the genetic structure of the Belgian population is a typical European population with signals of recent migration from the African continent.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Genetic variation of the Belgian population related to continental populations. Plot of the first two principal components (PC) based on a PC analysis using 47,802 SNPs from five continental populations as indicated (AFR African, AMR American, EAS East Asian, EUR European, SAS South Asian). Belgian data (BEL) were mapped independently. Total variability captured by each PC is indicated by axis labels. For Belgian samples with a migration background that map outside the European population, the background is indicated. See main text for SNP filtering criteria

The genetic structure of the Belgian population mirrors its geographical location in Europe

Our next goal was to examine how the Belgian population differs from other European populations. After a similar SNP filtering strategy as described above, the PC analysis was repeated using the European populations from the 1000 Genomes Project. Only the first two PCs were informative for a rather small variance of 0.76 and 0.35% respectively (Additional file 4: Figure S2a). As expected, the PC plot mimics European geography with a clear separation between Finnish, British, and South European populations. In agreement with this geographical orientation, most of the Belgian population mapped between the British and Southern European populations. Few samples mapped closer or within the South European populations, and for seven of these, a South European origin could indeed be confirmed (Fig. 4 and Additional file 4: Figure S2b). These data show the uniqueness of the Belgian genetic structure in Europe with geographically related differences with the other European populations.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Genetic variation of the Belgian population related to other European populations. Plot of the first two principal components (PC) based on a PC analysis using 41,083 SNPs from five other European populations as indicated (GBR British, CEU Utah Residents with Northern and Western European Ancestry, FIN Finnish, IBS Iberian population in Spain, TSI Toscani in Italy). Belgian data (BEL) were mapped independently. Total variability captured by each PC is indicated by the axis labels. All Belgian samples with a South European migration background are indicated. See Additional file 4: Figure S2 for more details related to migration backgrounds. See main text for SNP filtering criteria

Minor genetic differences between Flanders and Wallonia

To examine potential differences between the three main geographic regions in Belgium, we excluded the 35 samples with non-Belgian origins and indicated regional information on the European PC model (Fig. 5). This PC analysis demonstrates a minor but clear genetic substructure in the Belgian population along a north-west to south-east geographic gradient, with Flemish inhabitants mapping in the north-west, Walloon inhabitants mapping in the south-east, and individuals from Brussels in between. A similar analysis based on sample origin information from the 10 different provinces confirmed these geographic-related genetic differences (Additional file 5: Figure S3).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Regional genetic variation within the Belgian population. Belgian samples were mapped on the European PC model (41,083 SNPs) and colored based on the region of inhabitance as indicated

To quantify the genetic differences between the three Belgian regions and compare them with other European populations, we calculated fixation indices (i.e., Fst values). Fst is a metric with values between 0 and 1 that is used to measure genetic distance between populations, in which high pairwise values indicate large population differentiation and vice versa. Fst values between the three Belgian regions were very small (between 1.8 and 2.5e−04) and smaller than with any other European population (Fst 3.2e−04 or higher) (Table 2), confirming the results from the PC analyses.
Table 2

Fst pairwise genetic distances between Belgian regional and other European populations, BelPHG-21 study, Belgium 2016

 

GBR

FIN

IBS

CEU

TSI

Flanders

Wallonia

Brussels

GBR

0

       

FIN

6.7e−03

0

      

IBS

2.4e−03

1.0e−02

0

     

CEU

3.2e−04

6.2e−03

2.2e−03

0

    

TSI

3.7e−03

1.1e−02

1.5e−03

3.3e−03

0

   

Flanders

6.5e−04

6.7e−03

1.9e−03

3.2e−04

2.7e−03

0

  

Wallonia

7.1e−04

7.1e−03

1.4e−03

4.1e−04

2.1e−03

2.5e−04

0

 

Brussels

6.5e−04

7.0e−03

1.8e−03

4.3e−04

2.5e−03

1.8e−04

1.8e−04

0

Finally, we correlated the variant allele frequencies of the Belgian population with other European populations. This analysis also allowed us to compare the Belgian population to the geographically and linguistically related population of the Netherlands, for which allele frequency data, but no genotyping data, are publicly available (Genome of the Netherlands project, GoNl [6]). As expected, and similar to the PC and Fst analysis, extremely good correlations were found with all European populations (Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.972 and higher). The best correlation was found with the GoNl data (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.992; Additional file 6: Figure S4).

In summary, these data show minor but clear genetic differences between the different regions in Belgium with a north-west to south-east geographical correlation. However, these differences were smaller than with any other European population.

Discussion

The BelPHG-21 study aims at developing an approach to estimate genetic variability at the level of the Belgian population and exploring how this genetic information can be associated with information collected via NHIS questionnaires. Here, we reported on the genetic structure of the Belgian population using ± 300,000 genome-wide SNPs, derived from saliva DNA sampled from 189 participants from the latest NHIS (2013). This is the first study on the genetic structure of the Belgian population and its regional differences. The Belgian population was found to be a typical European population with signals of recent migration from the African continent. Within Europe, the Belgian population has its unique properties, which clearly mirrors the geographic orientation and again with signs of recent migration from Southern Europe. While minor genetic differences were observed between the different Belgian regions, these were smaller than with any other population studied.

The linkage possibilities to health, demographic, and related data from the NHIS provide a unique opportunity to study the different factors that determine participation in a genetic study and to better understand public willingness to participate in population genetic research. Consent rates to participate in this study were rather low (14%). Related studies that recruited people with previous participation in health research reported on variable consent rates between 21 and 85% [1518]. The 3-year time gap between the NHIS and the second contact, inviting participation in the BelPHG-21 study, may be a reason for the relatively low participation rate. Furthermore, subjects were contacted only by an invitation letter (and reminder). We noted regional differences in the consent rate, a higher consent for non-smokers and a positive association with age and education level. The higher likelihood of educated people to give consent is in agreement with other studies [1921]. The correlation with age is more ambiguous, with reports of both younger age as well as older age being associated with lower consent [15, 20, 22]. The observation of smokers to be less likely to provide consent is in contradiction to other studies [23]. However, in our study, the difference was attributed to a higher consent rate for former smokers than for current smokers, while no significant difference was observed between current smokers and never smokers, indicating a more complex association with smoking status.

The close mirroring of population genetic variation with geography is a well-known phenomenon that has been described at the European level previously [8, 9]. Novembre et al. described a geographical map of Europe that arose naturally as an efficient PCA-based two-dimensional summary of genetic variation in European individuals from different countries (including 43 Belgians) [8]. This has been shown not only on national, but also on regional levels, as exemplified by genetic substructures that were observed in Sweden [10, 24], Finland [7, 25], the Netherlands [6], and several other European countries [9]. While this mirroring of the Belgian genetic structure with its geographical orientation in Europe was expected, it is quite remarkable to see the same phenomenon at regional and to a lesser extent even at provincial levels in a small country like Belgium.

Belgium is a country of immigration, with substantial labor-related migration waves after the Second World War [13]. This is reflected in this study, in which 18.5% of the samples originated from individuals with a migration background. Apart from the expected origin from neighboring countries, the most frequent migration backgrounds were South European and African, in agreement with migration data. This non-Belgian origin was clearly reflected in the genetic structure of the Belgian population. Information on migration background was derived from NHIS data and based on to the country of birth of the parents of the study participant. While this study demonstrated the usefulness of this type of NHIS-related information, there are some limitations. First, the information is limited to the first generation only (parents). This likely explains why one individual with a clear non-European genetic background was not found to have a migration background based on our criteria, which is unlikely. Secondly, there is also a risk of false positive migration findings as country of birth does not necessarily imply the individual (or his parents) originated in that country.

The NHIS contains information related to health, lifestyle, environment, etc. [11]. Therefore, linking genetic information to NHIS data has great potential for genome-wide association studies. While the current sample size (189) is rather limited, we will use the experience gathered in this study to set up a larger genetic study linked to the next NHIS (2018) where we aim to sequence the entire genome from a representative sample of ± 1000 individuals from the Belgian population using whole genome sequencing techniques. This genetic epidemiology study will also give a concrete idea about the expected number of harmful variants in the genome of a typical Belgian individual, including the prevalence of several genetic disease carriers. Results from these studies will be an invaluable resource in the transition towards precision public health, focusing on subsets of the population at increased risk, rather than on the entire population.

Conclusions

This is the first study on the genetic structure of the Belgian population and its regional variation. The Belgian population is a typical European population with minor but clear differences between the regions and clear signs of recent migration.

Methods

BelPHG-21 study design

The BelPHG-21 study is a cross-sectional population-based study, conducted in 2016. The study population was selected from the participants of the most recent (2013) NHIS. Persons from the German community or with a missing national identification number were excluded for logistic reasons. Only one member per household was included, and the participants that did not complete the auto-questionnaire part of the NHIS in 2013 (which contains information on health, lifestyle, and environment), that were deceased, deregistered or with a discrepancy between self-reported and calculated age were excluded. From the resulting 5768 eligible candidates, a random subsample of 1468 individuals was invited to participate in the BelPHG-21 study. Individuals were invited via postal mail. They received an invitation letter with all the information on the BelPHG-21 study as well as informed consent forms to return in case of participation. Individuals that consented to participate in the study were subsequently sent a saliva sample collection kit (Oragene® saliva collection device (OG-500, DNA Genotek Inc. Ottawa, Canada)) accompanied by an information letter, a user manual for sample collection, a safety bag, and a pre-paid and UN3373-labeled bubble. Each package complied with the guidance on regulations for the transport of infectious substances. All communication with study participants (consent, sampling kits) was performed by a trusted third party (Belgian Federal Service of Internal Affairs) that was not involved in the downstream research in any way. They submitted the received samples to the BelPHG-21 research team and provided linking information to the NHIS database.

Sample preparation and SNP array

Upon receipt of saliva samples by the BelPHG-21 research team, DNA was manually extracted from the total sample following the manufacturer’s instructions (DNA Genotek, PD-PR-015 Issue 10/2015-01). DNA samples were quantified using UV absorbance, and SNPs at ± 300,000 sites were determined using the whole genome scanning 12-sample Illumina HumanCytoSNP-12v2.1 BeadChip according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were captured on Cytoscan (Illumina), and data were primarily analyzed using Illumina’s GenomeStudio software.

NHIS data

Information related to the study participants’ residence (region and province), migration background, and a set of variables that could influence the consent rate was obtained from the NHIS-2013 database. A subject was considered to have a migration background when at least one of its parents was born outside of Belgium. The variables that were considered to potentially influence consent rates were the background characteristics (demographic information, education, employment, income), health behavior and lifestyle characteristics (substance abuse, nutritional status, physical activity), physical and social environment characteristics (housing, passive smoking), and health and wellbeing characteristics (chronic diseases, mental health, perceived health). Selection of the variables for the predictive model was conducted by stepwise-weighted binomial regression analysis. Survey weights were calculated based on age, gender, and region of residence.

Demographic and geographic data

Demographic data from the 2013 Belgian population were downloaded from Eurostat (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat). Belgian geographic data were obtained using the BelgiumMaps.Statbel R package (available at http://www.datatailor.be/rcube/).

SNP data processing

Genotype calls were imported in R and converted in a sample x SNP matrix. Samples with genotyping call rates lower than 0.6 were excluded from further analysis. All genotypes were converted so that the reference allele always referred to the positive strand of the human genome build hg19. Genomic coordinates for all SNPs were retrieved from dbSNP Build 144 [26]. SNPs not present in dbSNP were excluded from further analysis. The R SNPRelate package [27] was used for downstream analysis (calculation of allele frequencies, principal component analysis, …). Therefore, genotyping data were first converted in genomic data structure (gds) format.

Principal component analysis

A principal component (PC) analysis was performed using phase 3 data from 1000 genomes [2]. VCF and sample information data were downloaded from the 1000 genomes ftp site (ftp://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp/release/20130502/), and genotype information from all SNPs overlapping with the BelPHG-21 study was extracted using the R VariantAnnotation package [28]. Belgian data were mapped independently on the PC model. The PC analysis was performed using the most informative SNPs by applying the following filtering criteria: (1) SNPs measured in all datasets, (2) lower than 2% missing values in both the 1000 genome dataset that was used to perform the PC analysis and the Belgian data, (3) only autosomes, (4) minor allele frequency higher than 5%, and (5) linkage disequilibrium lower than 0.2.

Variant allele frequency correlations

Correlations between variant allele frequencies (VAF) were determined using Pearson’s correlation. Correlations were determined for SNPs after filtering using the higher mentioned criteria. Variant allele frequencies from the Genome of the Netherlands (GoNl) project were derived from the release 5 vcf files downloaded at https://molgenis26.target.rug.nl/downloads/gonl_public/variants/release5/.

Abbreviations

PC: 

Principal component

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

VAF: 

Variant allele frequency

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all colleagues at the WIV-ISP that contributed to the accomplishment of the BelPHG-21 project. We acknowledge the support of the Platform Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, the ICT team, the dispatch center, and the communication team of the WIV-ISP as well as the Federal Service of Internal Affairs for the sample coding. Finally, we acknowledge all study subjects for their participation.

Funding

The BelPHG-21 study is funded by the Belgian Science Policy via the BRAIN.be (Belgian Research Action through Interdisciplinary Network) research program (BR/121/PI/BELPHG-21).

Availability of data and materials

Individual genotyping data generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions. All other data (e.g., variant allele frequencies) generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

Authors’ contributions

MVDB, JT, HVO, and VDW designed the BelPHG-21 study. JVdE analyzed the genomic data and wrote the manuscript. TD and EG did the statistical analysis related to factors determining consent rates. SDK and NR were responsible for the sample preparations and DNA extractions. JRV was responsible for the micro-array analysis. SD and JT performed the NHIS 2013 correlations. ED and VDW prepared the BelPHG-21 applications to ethical and privacy committees. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All study participants provided informed consent to participate in the study. The BelPHG-21 study design was approved by the Belgian Privacy commission (RR 37/2015) and the Ethics Committee of the University of Leuven.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
(2)
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
(3)
Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
(4)
Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
(5)
Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

References

  1. Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, MA DP, Durbin RM, Handsaker RE, Kang HM, Marth GT, McVean GA. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491:56–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Auton A, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DM, Durbin RM, Abecasis GR, Bentley DR, Chakravarti A, Clark AG, Donnelly P, Eichler EE, Flicek P, Gabriel SB, Gibbs RA, Green ED, Hurles ME, Knoppers BM, Korbel JO, Lander ES, Lee C, Lehrach H, Mardis ER, Marth GT, McVean GA, Nickerson DA, Schmidt JP, Sherry ST, Wang J, Wilson RK, Gibbs RA, Boerwinkle E, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jiang Y, Epstein MP, Conneely KN. Assessing the impact of population stratification on association studies of rare variation. Hum Hered. 2013;76:28–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Ameur A, Dahlberg J, Olason P, Vezzi F, Karlsson R, Lundin P, Che H, Thutkawkorapin J, Kusalananda Kahari A, Dahlberg M, Viklund J, Hagberg J, Jareborg N, Jonasson I, Johansson A, Lundin S, Nilsson D, Nystedt B, Magnusson P, Gyllensten U. SweGen: a whole-genome map of genetic variability in a cross-section of the Swedish population. bioRxiv. 2016;Google Scholar
  5. Gudbjartsson DF, Helgason H, Gudjonsson SA, Zink F, Oddson A, Gylfason A, Besenbacher S, Magnusson G, Halldorsson BV, Hjartarson E, Sigurdsson GT, Stacey SN, Frigge ML, Holm H, Saemundsdottir J, Helgadottir HT, Johannsdottir H, Sigfusson G, Thorgeirsson G, Sverrisson JT, Gretarsdottir S, Walters GB, Rafnar T, Thjodleifsson B, Bjornsson ES, Olafsson S, Thorarinsdottir H, Steingrimsdottir T, Gudmundsdottir TS, Theodors A, et al. Large-scale whole-genome sequencing of the Icelandic population. Nat Genet. 2015;47:435–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Genome of the Netherlands Consortium LC, Menelaou A, Pulit SL, van Dijk F, Palamara PF, Elbers CC, PBT N, Ye K, Guryev V, Kloosterman WP, Deelen P, Abdellaoui A, van Leeuwen EM, van Oven M, Vermaat M, Li M, JFJ L, Karssen LC, Kanterakis A, Amin N, Hottenga JJ, Lameijer E-W, Kattenberg M, Dijkstra M, Byelas H, van Setten J, van Schaik BDC, Bot J, Nijman IJ, Renkens I, et al. Whole-genome sequence variation, population structure and demographic history of the Dutch population. Nat Genet. 2014;46:818–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jakkula E, Rehnström K, Varilo T, Pietiläinen OPH, Paunio T, Pedersen NL, de Faire U, Järvelin M-R, Saharinen J, Freimer N, Ripatti S, Purcell S, Collins A, Daly MJ, Palotie A, Peltonen L. The genome-wide patterns of variation expose significant substructure in a founder population. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:787–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Novembre J, Johnson T, Bryc K, Kutalik Z, Boyko AR, Auton A, Indap A, King KS, Bergmann S, Nelson MR, Stephens M, Bustamante CD. Genes mirror geography within Europe. Nature. 2008;456:98–101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelis M, Esko T, Mägi R, Zimprich F, Zimprich A, Toncheva D, Karachanak S, Piskáčková T, Balaščák I, Peltonen L, Jakkula E, Rehnström K, Lathrop M, Heath S, Galan P, Schreiber S, Meitinger T, Pfeufer A, Wichmann H-E, Melegh B, Polgár N, Toniolo D, Gasparini P, D’Adamo P, Klovins J, Nikitina-Zake L, Kučinskas V, Kasnauskienė J, Lubinski J, Debniak T, et al. Genetic structure of Europeans: a view from the north–east. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5472.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Humphreys K, Grankvist A, Leu M, Hall P, Liu J, Ripatti S, Rehnström K, Groop L, Klareskog L, Ding B, Grönberg H, Xu J, Pedersen NL, Lichtenstein P, Mattingsdal M, Andreassen OA, O’Dushlaine C, Purcell SM, Sklar P, Sullivan PF, Hultman CM, Palmgren J, Magnusson PKE. The genetic structure of the Swedish population. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22547.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Demarest S, Van der Heyden J, Charafeddine R, Drieskens S, Gisle L, Tafforeau J. Methodological basics and evolution of the Belgian health interview survey 1997–2008. Arch Public Heal. 2013;71:24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Drieskens S, Demarest S, D’Hoker N, Ortiz B, Tafforeau J. Is a Health Interview Survey an appropriate tool to assess domestic violence? Eur J Pub Health. 2017;27:903–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Martiniello M. Belgium, migration, 1946 to present. In: The encyclopedia of global human migration. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2013.Google Scholar
  14. Durbin RM, Altshuler DL, Durbin RM, Abecasis GR, Bentley DR, Chakravarti A, Clark AG, Collins FS, De La Vega FM, Donnelly P, Egholm M, Flicek P, Gabriel SB, Gibbs RA, Knoppers BM, Lander ES, Lehrach H, Mardis ER, McVean GA, Nickerson DA, Peltonen L, Schafer AJ, Sherry ST, Wang J, Wilson RK, Gibbs RA, Deiros D, Metzker M, Muzny D, Reid J, et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010;467:1061–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bogner HR, Wittink MN, Merz JF, Straton JB, Cronholm PF, Rabins PV, Gallo JJ. Personal characteristics of older primary care patients who provide a buccal swab for apolipoprotein E testing and banking of genetic material: the spectrum study. Community Genet. 2005;7:202–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Le Marchand L, Lum-jones A, Saltzman B, Marchand L, Visaya V, AMY N, Kolonel LN. Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study 1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2001;10:701–3.Google Scholar
  17. Cozier YC, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L. Comparison of methods for collection of DNA samples by mail in the Black Women’s Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14:117–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Moorman PG, Skinner CS, Evans JP, Newman B, Sorenson JR, Calingaert B, Susswein L, Crankshaw TS, Hoyo C, Schildkraut JM. Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:1349–54.Google Scholar
  19. Audrain J, Tercyak KP, Goldman P, Bush A. Recruiting adolescents into genetic studies of smoking behavior recruiting adolescents into genetic studies of smoking behavior 1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002;11:249–52.Google Scholar
  20. Sterling R, Henderson GE, Corbie-Smith G. Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1971–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Royal C, Baffoe-Bonnie A, Kittles R, Powell I, Bennett J, Hoke G, Pettaway C, Weinrich S, Vijayakumar S, Ahaghotu C, Mason T, Johnson E, Obeikwe M, Simpson C, Mejia R, Boykin W, Roberson P, Frost J, Faison-Smith L, Meegan C, Foster N, Furbert-Harris P, Carpten J, Bailey-Wilson J, Trent J, Berg K, Dunston G, Collins F. Recruitment experience in the first phase of the African American Hereditary Prostate Cancer (AAHPC) study. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8 Suppl):S68–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Oliver JM, Slashinski MJ, Wang T, Kelly PA, Hilsenbeck SG, McGuire AL. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants’ perspectives. Public Health Genomics. 2012;15:106–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Audrain J, Tercyak KP, Goldman P, Bush A. Recruiting adolescents into genetic studies of smoking behavior. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002;11:249–52.Google Scholar
  24. Ameur A, Dahlberg J, Olason P, Vezzi F, Karlsson R, Martin M, Viklund J, Kähäri AK, Lundin P, Che H, Thutkawkorapin J, Eisfeldt J, Lampa S, Dahlberg M, Hagberg J, Jareborg N, Liljedahl U, Jonasson I, Johansson Å, Feuk L, Lundeberg J, Syvänen A-C, Lundin S, Nilsson D, Nystedt B, Magnusson PK, Gyllensten U. SweGen: a whole-genome data resource of genetic variability in a cross-section of the Swedish population. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25:1253–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. McEvoy BP, Montgomery GW, McRae AF, Ripatti S, Perola M, Spector TD, Cherkas L, Ahmadi KR, Boomsma D, Willemsen G, Hottenga JJ, Pedersen NL, Magnusson PKE, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Kaprio J, Heikkilä K, Palotie A, Widen E, Muilu J, Syvänen A-C, Liljedahl U, Hardiman O, Cronin S, Peltonen L, Martin NG, Visscher PM. Geographical structure and differential natural selection among North European populations. Genome Res. 2009;19:804–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:308–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Zheng X, Levine D, Shen J, Gogarten SM, Laurie C, Weir BS. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3326–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Obenchain V, Lawrence M, Carey V, Gogarten S, Shannon P, Morgan M. VariantAnnotation: a Bioconductor package for exploration and annotation of genetic variants. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2076–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement