Skip to main content

COVID-19 2022 update: transition of the pandemic to the endemic phase


COVID-19, which is caused by the SARS-CoV-2, has ravaged the world for the past 2 years. Here, we review the current state of research into the disease with focus on its history, human genetics and genomics and the transition from the pandemic to the endemic phase. We are particularly concerned by the lack of solid information from the initial phases of the pandemic that highlighted the necessity for better preparation to face similar future threats. On the other hand, we are gratified by the progress into human genetic susceptibility investigations and we believe now is the time to explore the transition from the pandemic to the endemic phase. The latter will require worldwide vigilance and cooperation, especially in emerging countries. In the transition to the endemic phase, vaccination rates have lagged and developed countries should assist, as warranted, in bolstering vaccination rates worldwide. We also discuss the current status of vaccines and the outlook for COVID-19.


By the end of December 2019, information began to circulate on an alarming form of pneumonia, of unknown etiology, that was afflicting the district of Wuhan, China. Two years later, it is of common knowledge that was the beginning of a pandemic, as declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1], triggered by the new Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

While facing the critical times of the manifestation of a "fourth wave,” amenable to the appearance of new variants [2,3,4], there has been exponential growth of new data. These data explore the genetics of the virus, the interaction with the host, as well as short-term and long-term clinical manifestations. Due to this, we believe there is need to provide an updated overview to uphold the commitment made in our latest Editorial [5].

In recent months, we globally experienced a rise in daily cases, contributing to a total of 527,971,809 cases and 6,284,871 deaths since the beginning of the pandemic (Johns Hopkins University, CSSE, accessed on 2022) [6]. Circulating variants have been supplanted by the new variant of concern (VOC) SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) and its sub-variants [7, tracking website accessed on April 19, 2022], as SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 and BA.2, which are now dominant in the USA (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC;, accessed on April 19, 2022) [8] and globally. Characterized by a greater ability to evade immune responses acquired through infection with a different strain [9] or through vaccination [10], this variant seems to be able to change the profile of current outbreak and, unlike in the previous waves, a higher rate of reinfections is reported [11, 12]. These early data, still under investigation, urge the scientific community toward the search for therapeutic and preventive tools that can counter this evolutionary mechanism.

In our review “COVID-19 one year into the pandemic: from genetics and genomics to therapy, vaccination, and policy” [13], we strongly claimed the determining role of vaccines as the most valuable aid to halt the spreading of SARS-CoV-2. We can now affirm that the increasing vaccination rate, with a total of 11.184.961.194 doses administered (Johns Hopkins University, CSSE, accessed on April 19, 2022) [6], is contributing to the containment of hospitalizations and deaths in the population affected by COVID-19 [14,15,16].

The importance of a homogeneous and universal distribution of vaccines is becoming more evident and incisive in hindering the appearance of new variants. In this regard, the disparities between advanced and developing countries seem to worsen, and this results in the inability to cope with new manifestations, as highlighted by the appearance of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 variant [17].

Origin and current state

COVID-19 was first reported in 2019 [18, 19]. It has now raged worldwide for more than 2 years, affecting every corner of our globe with no clear indication how the pandemic started. An intelligible understanding of the origins of this pandemic is critical to be better prepared in the future. We lament that a panel proposed by the WHO in 2021 to achieve this goal has not yet reached significant conclusions [20].

While the pandemic is still raging, sprouts of hope have emerged that we may be transitioning into the endemic phase [21]. The pervasive Omicron variant, currently predominant, may lead to this course [22]. However, overly exuberant enthusiasm must be tempered by a sense of reality and concern for emerging countries [21, 23, 24]. Developed countries must remain vigilant and assist emerging countries in the fight against SARS-CoV-2, with the aim of detecting new variants of concern (Fig. 1), investigating animal reservoirs and sharing diagnostic tools, surveillance and therapies [25].

Fig. 1
figure 1

A comical view of the history of COVID-19. A few translations: “vorhersehbar” = predictable and “war ja klar” = obviously or sure or of course. Reproduced with permission (Mira Nagel)

Clinical manifestation of COVID-19 and post-acute (long) COVID-19

It is now known that COVID-19 is a multisystem condition that largely involves the respiratory system. It starts as an upper respiratory tract infection that subsequently affects the lungs and establishes, in the most severe cases, interstitial pneumonia (showing the diagnostic ground glass appearance, through CT investigation), severe respiratory failure, systemic inflammatory response and multi-organ dysfunction. Classic symptoms of the disease are listed as fever, asthenia, dry cough, nasal congestion and breathing difficulties.

Signs and symptoms, however, can affect several organs. Other systems can be involved, such as the central nervous system (hypo-anosmia, loss of the sense of taste, speech disturbances, dizziness, alterations of the consciousness and behavior, impaired walking and maintenance of upright position, impaired hearing and vision), the cardiovascular system (alterations in hemostasis, arrhythmia, heart failure), the gastrointestinal system (nausea, emesis, diarrhea, abdominal pain), the renal system, neuromuscular (myalgia) and skin adnexa [26].

Clinical manifestation of infection is therefore extremely heterogeneous, ranging from completely asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic subjects to critically ill patients who require hospitalization and ventilatory support in intensive care unit [27, 28]. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the medical community has been aware of the greater susceptibility of patients with advanced age and comorbidities to the most serious forms of the disease, but we now know that patients with a younger age can also be critically affected [29].

Although virus-host interactions have been deeply investigated [30,31,32], the mechanisms underpinning a longer persistence of the symptoms in some patients or their recurrence (4 to 5 weeks, or even 1 year) after the resolution of the disease remain to be understood [33].

The persistence of fatigue, headache, and anosmia, the onset of anxiety and a depressive state are symptoms that have recently been included in the so-called post-acute (long) COVID-19 [26, 33, 34].

Like COVID-19, post-acute (long) COVID-19 is configured as a systemic disease and therefore symptoms are extremely varied and of difficult clinical interpretation. They can occur singly or in combination, they can be transient, intermittent or constant, and they can even change over the course of the condition.

The systems involved in post-acute (long) COVID-19 are mainly respiratory, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular and neurological [35].

Given the predominantly respiratory nature of the condition, lungs are the organs susceptible to the most severe outcomes, not only on a structural level (e.g., secondary interstitial fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension) [36, 37], but also on a functional level (e.g., reduced ventilatory capacity, dyspnea, fatigue) [37,38,39].

Respiratory sequelae have inevitably been shown to have repercussions at neuromuscular levels. In fact, dysfunctions of both respiratory and skeletal muscles have been described in about 40% of patients admitted to intensive care units, resulting in persistent symptoms of fatigue, weakness and shortness of breath [40,41,42]. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that a direct muscle affection of SARS-CoV-2 may be responsible for structural alterations, even in patients who have had an apparently mild disease outcome [43].

The heart has been shown to be a target organ of the systemic inflammatory response and subject to direct damage from SARS-CoV-2 [35]. Specifically, the most described cardiovascular complications refer to heart failure, arrhythmias, peri-myocarditis, venous and arterial thromboembolism and “reverse Tako-Tsubo” cardiomyopathy [35, 44, 45].

Approximately 25% of patients who developed COVID-19 experienced neurological disorders of various degrees in the months following diagnosis [46]. The most common and mild symptoms include headache [47], disturbances in perception of taste and smell [48,49,50], “brain fog” and memory disorders [51]. Among the major complications, however, those mostly described were the presence of diffuse brain damage of inflammatory [52] or acute metabolic origins (toxic-metabolic encephalopathies) [53], Guillain-Barré syndrome [54, 55], Miller-Fisher syndrome [56], ischemic vasculitis [57], dysautonomic dysfunctions [55, 58, 59] and seizures. In addition to these complications. we urge the scientific community to deeply investigate mood disorders that might develop on a psychological substrate in response to stressors established during the pandemic period [46, 52, 60, 61]. Various mechanisms may underlie the neurological implications of SARS-CoV-2 [35, 62]. The systemic inflammatory response triggered in COVID-19 patients could potentially accelerate the evolution of neurodegenerative processes by exacerbating chronic conditions present at the time of infection but not yet manifest [35, 63, 64]. For example, the inflammatory response could exacerbate a refractory epileptic condition [65]. Several studies also reported direct damage of the brain tissue caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection [35, 66, 67].

In a novel, quantitative, longitudinal imaging study from Douaud et al. [68], authors analyzed brain scans of 401 SARS-CoV-2 positive cases, acquired at two time points (before and after testing positive for infection), and 384 matching controls. Following the description of hundreds of derived phenotypes, the comparison provided suggestions as to what could be further investigated as effect caused by, or attributable to, the SARS-CoV-2 infection. A clear involvement of the olfactory cortex has been detected through variations in tissue damage markers. The evaluation of gray matter decrease showed FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose) hypometabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex, insula, parahippocampal gyrus, and anterior cingulate cortex, suggesting a significant implication of the regions connected to the piriform cortex. In conclusion, the effect of reduction in the gray matter appears to be generalized, with a greater relevance at the level of the olfactory system.

However, to date, knowledge of the molecular mechanisms and neurological consequences in the post-acute (long) COVID-19 is still limited [69, 70].

In a broad sense, it has been hypothesized that post-acute (long) COVID-19 can be considered a condition characterized by a chronic persistence of low levels of inflammatory cytokines [71]. According to this assertion, it is likely that the activation of some cellular transcription factors, including the nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NFE2)-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a possible therapeutic target in several chronic neurodegenerative conditions [72,73,74], may have a role in increasing the expression of enzymes capable of synthesizing glutathione, therefore reducing the state of oxidative stress [71, 74, 75]. However, further data and trials are needed [76].

A recent study highlighted a significant formation of blood micro-clots, both in the acute phase and in the post-illness phase. These micro-clots seem to show resistance to the body’s fibrinolytic processes in patients suffering from post-acute (long) COVID-19. Preliminary results demonstrated the efficacy in reducing the symptoms of long COVID-19 patients through the administration of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy [77].

Understanding the signs and symptoms of the disease and of post-acute (long) COVID-19 represents a major current therapeutic challenge. This will allow us, in the near future, not only to better elucidate the molecular mechanisms of our body’s response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, but also to identify therapeutic targets for an increasingly personalized medicine.

Genetic susceptibility in the host

Viruses, like other pathogens, are necessary, but not sufficient, to trigger disease [78]. It therefore appears evident that the individual host genome plays a fundamental role, not only in the susceptibility to disease induced by the infectious agent, but also in the individual response in terms of severity of the phenotype or resistance to infection [78]. Numerous host genes have been identified in the last two years that are active in susceptibility/resistance to infectious diseases [5, 13, 79,80,81]. Identifying and qualifying these genes as prognostic and predictive biomarkers is crucial to optimize patient management and promote sustainable and rational public health (PH) interventions. In addition, they contribute to clarify the mechanisms and variability of the SARS-CoV-2 host–pathogen interactions [81].

Common and rare variants have been identified in different studies using a) classical Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and b) deep sequencing of genes coding for protein referable to precise biochemical pathways involved in the pathogenesis of the infection. These studies have made it possible to identify alleles of increased susceptibility and/or partial resistance to the COVID-19, in coding and non-coding regions of genes. For example, a functional analysis of a SNP (rs11385942), identified by GWAS on chromosome 3p21.31, demonstrated the involvement of the LZTFL1 protein (leucine zipper transcription factor like 1) [82], which regulates ciliary localization in the BBSome complex. This gene is mutated in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS) (MIM#209,900), a ciliopathy characterized in part by polydactyly, obesity, cognitive impairment, hypogonadism, and kidney failure. LZTFL1 is highly expressed in ciliated cells, including airway ciliated cells. Its reduced expression leads to fewer airway ciliated cells with shorter cilia, which could result in inefficient viral airway clearance in COVID-19 patients. Similarly, the SNP rs74956615, which maps on the chromosome 19p13.2 in the untranslated 3' of the RAVER1 gene [82], has been found to modulate the expression of RAVER1 itself. This gene encodes for a ribonucleoprotein which cooperates with cytoskeletal proteins vinculin/metavinculin and alpha-actinin to modulate alternative splicing events. However, RAVER1 is a co-activator of MDA5 (IFIH1), which recognizes nucleic acids associated with viral infections such as dsRNAs, including SARS-CoV-2, and activates antiviral response genes, including IFNB1, ICAM1, TNF and CCL5. A large human genetic study, involving more than 49,000 COVID-19-affected individuals and 2 million control subjects, identified 13 loci in the human genome that affect COVID-19 susceptibility and severity including 6 loci previously not reported [83]. In the regions mapped by this extensive GWAS, authors identified more than 40 candidate genes, several of which are involved in immune function or have known functions in the lungs, suggesting that these may have important effects on COVID-19. A suggestive susceptibility locus on chromosome 12q22, has been recently detected in Thai population [84]. Genes mapped in this area include EEA1 and LOC643339. EEA1 is involved in viral entry into cells, while LOC643339 is a long non-coding RNA. Intriguingly, EEA1 is involved in the entry of African Swine Fever Virus via endosomal pathway [85]. Utilizing a Phenome-Wide Association Study (PheWAS) approach, Regan and Colleagues [86] identified novel phenotypic associations with genes encoding proteins active in the antiviral response and inflammatory processes. These genomic biomarkers can have pleiotropic effects in COVID-19-related comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disease, arthropathy and endocrinopathy), which in turn increase the risk of severe COVID-19.

Finally, a recent GWAS meta-analysis that considered 125,584 cases and over 2.5 million controls evaluating 60 studies from 25 countries included 11 new significant loci at the genome level, in addition to those previously identified. Genes in the new loci include SFTPD, MUC5B and ACE2, revealing convincing information on the susceptibility and severity of the disease [83].

Candidate-gene approach, on the other hand, made it possible to confirm and integrate the role of some specific pathways and proteins in the pathogenesis of the disease. Among the first candidate genes studied in SARS-CoV-2 infection were those coding for the HLA system, which plays a crucial role in the immune response [87, 88]. Several studies have highlighted risk alleles capable of influencing the clinical course of patients infected with various RNA viruses (e.g., H1N1 influenza virus [89], Hantaan virus [90] and SARS-CoV-1 [87]). Several studies have highlighted HLA alleles of susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 [28, 91]. However, these studies revealed discrepancies due to different stratifications of patients and controls and to the different frequency distribution of the HLA alleles in the populations analyzed. Recently, a large and accurate study described a potential association of HLA-C*04:01 with severe clinical course of COVID-19. Carriers of HLA-C*04:01 had twice the risk of needing intubation when infected with SARS-CoV-2 [92]. Numerous other candidate genes have been analyzed on the basis of their biological function during infection, such as ACE2, TMPRSS2, DPP4, and Furin, involved in the entry of the virus into cells, or genes active in the viral egress such as WWP1 and NEDD4 [93,94,95,96,97]. Curiously, an association of VDR gene polymorphisms with COVID-19 outcomes has been also detected [98]. The possible involvement of this receptor is supported by recent studies that provided evidence for an altered vitamin D gene signature in CD4 + T lymphocytes in patients with severe COVID-19. Chauss and colleagues [99] demonstrated that severe COVID-19 may result from a dysfunction of type I immune response, that involves the vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling. Similarly, it is interesting to observe how individuals with African descent, homozygous for the G1 or G2 variant of apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1), have an increased risk of acute kidney disease compared to subjects with low-risk variants [100]. A recent study revealed an association of phenotype severity and polymorphisms of the MBL2 gene, which encodes a mannose-binding lectin (MBL) secreted by the liver and involved in innate immune defense [101]. Innate immunity is our immune system’s first line of defense and plays a central role in SARS-CoV-2 infection [102]. Although studied for over 100 years, only in recent years has significant progress has been achieved, largely due to the genetic dissection of innate immune pathways [103].

Several clinical and immunological studies have shown that type I interferons (IFN-I) play critical roles in the control and pathogenesis of COVID-19 [81, 104,105,106,107]. This notion is supported by extensive sequencing of numerous patients with severe forms of COVID-19 that identified pathogenic mutations in genes encoding active proteins in the interferon circuit [81]. The characterization of autoantibodies capable of neutralizing IFN-I in 10–15% of severe patients allows us to state that COVID-19 can be defined as an interferonopathy [108].

Identifying susceptibility alleles in COVID-19 is important in order to improve predictive testing and stratify different subgroups of SARS-CoV-2 positive subjects, which can be treated in a personalized way. However, it is possible that in a complex multifactorial and multigenic disease, such as COVID-19, several genetic, epigenetic and socio-demographic factors are modulating the phenotypic manifestation, thus complicating the analysis of genotype–phenotype correlations [32].

Interestingly, the CHGE Consortium (Covid Human Genetic Effort, initiated a study to enroll individuals (referred to as “resistant”) who were not infected with SARS-CoV-2 despite repeated exposure (e.g., care-givers or familiars of a patient with severe pneumonia), as evidenced by the absence of the disease and virus specific antibody titers in several tests [81, 106, 108,109,110,111]. It is conceivable that these subjects carry monogenic variations that make them naturally resistant to virus entry, or much more active in eliminating the virus by activating appropriate defense mechanisms such as the genes of the interferon circuit. Interestingly, a splice variant of OAS1 gene, which appears to have a protective effect, has been identified frequently in people of African ancestry [112]. OAS1 encodes for an enzyme catalyzing the synthesis of short polyadenylates, which activate ribonuclease L that in turn degrades intracellular double-stranded RNA and triggers several other antiviral mechanisms [113].

Using trans-ancestry fine-mapping approaches, Huffman et al. [114] recently demonstrated that the rs10774671-G splice variant determines the length of the protein encoded by the gene OAS1, which results in an enzyme more effective at breaking down SARS-CoV-2. It is important to clarify that the genes of susceptibility to pathogens, although of biological and genetic interest, cannot in any way confer a sort of “natural immunity” to infection at an individual level and cannot replace the important protective role offered by vaccines.

Certainly several “resistance” alleles of genes involved in the different pathways activated by the infection of SARS-CoV-2 will be identified in the next months [80, 95, 112]. However, until it is possible to develop polygenic scores programs which must then be validated on large numbers, it is unlikely that they can be used to identify resistant subjects and direct them to selective and specific therapeutic treatments. These studies have made it possible to elucidate many aspects of the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and have provided many biological responses to the pathogen-host relationship that could prove important in other viral infections [81]. In this regard, it seems interesting to report a recent study that correlates the loss of smell or taste, very frequent in COVID-19, to variants of the UGT2A1 and UGT2A2 genes expressed in the olfactory neuroepithelium, which lines the posterior nasal cavity, and is exposed to a wide range of odorants and compounds present in the air [115].

The locations of investigated genes of interest are resumed in Fig. 2 [5, 116].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Chromosome ideogram representing the location of genes of interest investigated for a role in defining susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (generated by [116])

Characteristics of available vaccines

While witnessing an exponential progress in studies aimed at understanding genetic and molecular mechanisms, we see their direct application in the tools which are currently the best candidates to lead us out of this pandemic: vaccines.

Since the beginning, several critical issues emerged which led to base the development of vaccines on safety, immunogenicity, durability of the immunity, dosing schedule, technological platform and ease of manufacture and transport.

Despite a widespread mistrust about safety and speed of production, nowadays, we can benefit of two types of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and of a growing number of data that support their efficacy and safety. Two messenger RNA (mRNA) (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and two viral vector (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 AZD1222 and Ad26.COV2.S) COVID-19 vaccines were developed [117]. A third type, protein subunit vaccines (NVX-CoV2373), has been approved by EMA, Indonesia, Australia and South Korea, while is still lacking a full approval by the FDA.

Findings show that the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162B2 vaccine is safe, with very rare incidence of myocarditis and swelling of the lymph nodes while coronavirus infection is associated with numerous serious adverse events such as increased risk of pericarditis, arrhythmias, heart attacks, strokes, pulmonary embolism, deep-vein thrombosis, acute kidney damage, and others [118]. The BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine has been shown to reduce viral load of breakthrough infections (BTIs), but its effectiveness declines after the third to fourth month [119].

The appearance of new SARS-CoV-2 variants poses new challenges for the development of vaccination platforms [120]. As a consequence, mRNA booster vaccines were developed to restore the viral neutralization activity that wanes after the initial two-dose vaccination, to maintain protection against emerging variants and to increase vaccine effectiveness in low immune response individuals such as elderly or immune suppressed. The need for multiple doses of the vaccine has sparked new debates, but evidence shows that vaccination with two doses of mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and a booster are safe and effective [121]. Moreover, the effectiveness of a third BNT162b2 vaccine booster was demonstrated in both reducing transmission and severe disease [122].

As previously stated, we are now aware that higher age and comorbidities are risk factors for poor outcomes, regardless of vaccination status [123, 124].

Among adolescents aged 16–17 years, 2-dose mRNA vaccine effectiveness increased to 86% a week days after booster dose and urgent care hospitalizations were substantially lower during the Omicron period than during the B.1.617.2 (Delta) predominant period among adolescents aged 12–17 years, with no significant protection ≥ 150 days after dose 2 during Omicron predominance [125]. An increasing number of studies are focusing on the efficacy of multiple doses in fragile categories: cancer patients receiving at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccine show reduced risk of COVID-19 [126]. Despite diffused concerns, it has now been established that the BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines can be safely administered during the third trimester of pregnancy, reporting excellent results in terms of immunogenicity [127].

The majority of vaccinated patients who required hospitalization due to COVID-19 were elderly with a high comorbidity burden thus being unable to develop a proper immune response following vaccination [128].

CDC recommends that all persons aged 12 years and older receive a booster dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine at least 5 months after completing the primary vaccination series (at least 2 months after receiving J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccination) and that adults 50 years and older, and moderately or severely immunocompromised people, if eligible, should receive a second booster dose at least 4 months after the previous one.

Vaccines impact on containing the pandemic escalation is evident [129]. Their effectiveness is clearly dose-dependent as it is higher after administration of a third dose compared to a second dose administration; however, vaccine effectiveness wanes with time [129]. For this reason, and because of the emerging variants that might overtake the currently available vaccines, the development of new vaccines, including variant-specific ones, should be encouraged and strongly supported. As of April 15, 2022, 153 vaccines are listed in clinical development and 195 in pre-clinical development (WHO,, accessed on April 15, 2022) [130].


At the official age of about 3 years, SARS-CoV-2 is no longer a baby, but it has proven a rather vicious toddler. Although ascribing intentions to a virus is naively anthropomorphic, we have to admit that it has managed to cut short the lives of many fellow-human beings, to change our ways of relating to each other, to subvert economies, to shift the priorities of pharmaceutical industry and of regulatory bodies. With respect to biomedical and public health research, as of May 29, there are 262,077,248 papers on COVID-19 listed in PubMed, but later tonight there will be more; and when we wish to discuss science, we pretend that meeting on line is just as good as being together in a seminar room – but it is not true.

From the evolutionary point of view, it has been a long-held tenet of parasitology that for a parasite what is at a premium is not to kill the host; rather, to have the host producing the maximum amount of parasite progeny. SARS-CoV-2 is a perfect illustration. The people infected have been at least half a billion: Mortality has been therefore high in absolute numbers, but at least 98% infected people have survived and have helped to spread the virus. Since the beginning of the pandemic, there have been thousands of mutations in the virus, most of them biologically neutral; at the moment, the predominant Omicron variant seems to be a compromise between high infectivity and relatively low mortality: Seen from the vantage point of the virus, the compromise is good, but not necessarily optimal as yet.

The wealth of studies that have explored the genetic variation in host susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 is impressive. There seem to be genetic factors that affect the probability of contracting the infection; and many studies have naturally preferred to focus on genetic factors that may allow the disease to become severe and life-threatening. We must admit that we have not yet hit the jackpot: Nobody has found a human genotype that bars infection, as homozygosity for the delta 32 allele of the CCR5 gene does for HIV [131]. Perhaps this is not altogether surprising: For an infectious agent to select a protective gene, it requires exposure to be continuous over the host’s many generations [132], as has been the case for P falciparum and the hemoglobin S gene [133]. If the postulated jump of SARS-CoV-2 into the human species has been very recent, there has been no time for selection of people having an originally rare mutant gene.

In last year’s update [13], we did briefly speculate about the apparently low numbers of COVID-19 cases in tropical Africa, and according to the WHO dashboard, this is still the case. In the two countries, we know best, there have been, officially, in Nigeria (population over 200 million) 119,322 cases and 1926 deaths to date; in Tanzania (population around 60 million), which for over a year has not reported cases, there are now on record 33,726 cases and 800 deaths. We do not yet know to what extent these low figures are due to underestimation; but from recent visits, we know that health workers are vaccinated. As for people in general, what we have learned to my surprise is that vaccine availability is not currently a limiting factor: Even when vaccination is free, uptake is quite low.

Anti-COVID-19 vaccination has been a success of technology and, in many countries, of public health campaigns. Some of us never thought that an effective vaccine could be designed, produced and field-tested within one year: but we have to stand corrected. In retrospect, the notion of using RNA to immunize against an RNA virus seems straightforward: Ugur Sahin and Ozlem Tureci deserve full scientific credit (in addition to many € millions in revenue) for what they have achieved. With most previous vaccines, peptides derived from the organism or from the purified protein injected are presented to T cells by Antigen Presenting Cells (APC). In this case, instead, nanoparticles that encapsulate the portion of the viral RNA that encodes the spike protein are endocytosed by the APCs, whose protein synthetic machinery is taken over to translate the RNA into the spike protein, peptides from which are then presented to T cells. A key to the ultra-fast development of the BioNTech vaccine has been this clever approach: Since it was unprecedented, nobody was entitled to predict (i) How it would work in practice, (ii) What would be the duration of immunity. With respect to (i) The results have been spectacular; with respect to (ii) One had to find out the answer empirically, and it turned out that, even after two doses, the duration is of the order of months, not years. Only the oldest among us can remember that when mRNA was discovered, one of its defining properties was a short life span [134]: It seems not far-fetched to hypothesize that the takeover of the APC’s ribosomes by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA is short-lived, and this may be at least one reason why immunity does not last very long.

Unlike the COVID-19 epidemic, the epidemic of no-Vax does not lend itself to mathematical analysis: It is not in the realm of biological science, but rather in the realm of psycho-patho-sociology [135]. We have all learnt that evidence-based reasoning does not make a dent in the hard-core no-Vax. Confrontation fails, and an approach based on lateral thinking may be better. Perhaps we should take this on as an intellectual challenge: If we can largely prevent severe COVID-19 by immunization, if we can find the molecular basis of many diseases, if in many cases we can cure leukemia, we should be able to also address the no-Vax problem.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.



Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2


Antigen presenting cells


Apolipoprotein L1


Bardet-Biedl syndrome


CC-chemokine ligand 5


Centers for disease control and prevention


Covid human genetic effort


Coronavirus disease 2019


Center for systems and software engineering


Computed tomography


Dipeptidyl peptidase 4


Early endosomal antigen 1


European medicines agency


Food and drug administration




Genome-wide association study


Hemagglutinin type 1 and neuraminidase type 1


Human leukocyte antigens


Inter-cellular adhesion molecule 1




Interferon beta 1


Leucine zipper transcription factor like 1


Mannose-binding lectin


Melanoma differentiation-associated rotein 5


Mucin protein 5B


Neural precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 4


Nuclear factor erythroid 2


Nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NFE2)-related factor 2


2'-5'-Oligoadenylate synthetase 1


Public Health


Phenome-wide association study


Ribonucleoprotein PTB-binding 1


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2


Surfactant protein D


Single nucleotide polymorphism


Transmembrane serine protease 2


Tumor necrosis factor


UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A


Vitamin D receptor


Variant of concern


World health organization


WW domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1


  1. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Division of Viral Diseases. CDC COVID-19 Science Briefs. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2020–. Science Brief: Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant. 2021 Dec 2.

  3. Queen D. Another year another variant: COVID 3.0-omicron. Int Wound J. 2022;19(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdullah F, Myers J, Basu D, Tintinger G, Ueckermann V, Mathebula M, et al. Decreased severity of disease during the first global omicron variant covid-19 outbreak in a large hospital in tshwane, south africa. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;116:38–42. (Epub 2021 Dec 28).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colona VL, Vasiliou V, Watt J, Novelli G, Reichardt JKV. Update on human genetic susceptibility to COVID-19: susceptibility to virus and response. Hum Genom. 2021;15(1):57.;15(1):59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(5):533–534. Epub 2020 Feb 19. Erratum in: Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(9):e215.

  7. O’Toole Á, Hill V, Pybus OG, Watts A, Bogoch II, Khan K, et al. Tracking the international spread of SARS-CoV-2 lineages B.1.1.7 and B.1.351/501Y-V2 with grinch. Wellcome Open Res. 2021;6:121.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. CDC. Centers for disease control and prevention. “ “.2022; Retrieved 19/04, 2022, from

  9. Altarawneh HN, Chemaitelly H, Hasan MR, Ayoub HH, Qassim S, AlMukdad S, et al. Protection against the Omicron variant from previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaguza C, Coppi A, Earnest R, Ferguson D, Kerantzas N, Warner F, et al. Rapid emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is associated with an infection advantage over Delta in vaccinated persons. Med (N Y). 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pulliam JRC, van Schalkwyk C, Govender N, von Gottberg A, Cohen C, Groome MJ, et al. Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection associated with emergence of Omicron in South Africa. Science. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. COVID-19 Reinfection Data (2022). Retrieved 19/04; 2022, from

  13. Novelli G, Biancolella M, Mehrian-Shai R, Colona VL, Brito AF, Grubaugh ND, et al. COVID-19 one year into the pandemic: from genetics and genomics to therapy, vaccination, and policy. Hum Genom. 2021;15(1):27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Muhsen K, Maimon N, Mizrahi A, Varticovschi B, Bodenheimer O, Gelbshtein U, et al. Effects of BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine booster in long-term care facilities in Israel. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):399–401. (Epub 2021 Dec 22).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tenforde MW, Self WH, Adams K, Gaglani M, Ginde AA, McNeal T, et al. Influenza and other viruses in the acutely Ill (IVY) network association between mRNA vaccination and COVID-19 hospitalization and disease severity. JAMA. 2021;326(20):2043–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tregoning JS, Flight KE, Higham SL, Wang Z, Pierce BF. Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(10):626–36. (Epub 2021 Aug 9).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Collie S, Champion J, Moultrie H, Bekker LG, Gray G. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine against omicron variant in South Africa. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(5):494–6. (Epub 2021 Dec 29).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis JT, Chinazzi M, Perra N, Mu K, Pastore Y, Piontti A, et al. Cryptic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and the first COVID-19 wave. Nature. 2021;600(7887):127–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Green MS. Did the hesitancy in declaring COVID-19 a pandemic reflect a need to redefine the term? Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1034–5. (Epub 2020 Mar 13).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. WHO. World Health Organization. “”. 2022; Retrieved 19/04, 2022, from

  21. COVID is here to stay. countries must decide how to adapt. Nature. 2022;601(7892):165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adam D. Will Omicron end the pandemic? Here’s What Experts Say Nature. 2022;602(7895):20–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Happi CT, Nkengasong JN. Two years of COVID-19 in Africa: lessons for the world. Nature. 2022.

  24. Servick K. Is it time to live with COVID-19? Some scientists warn of ‘endemic delusion’. Science. 2022.

  25. Hale VL, Dennis PM, McBride DS, Nolting JM, Madden C, Huey D, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in free-ranging white-tailed deer. Nature. 2022;602(7897):481–6. (Epub 2021 Dec 23).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar A, Narayan RK, Prasoon P, Kumari C, Kaur G, Kumar S, et al. COVID-19 mechanisms in the human body-what we know so far. Front Immunol. 2021;1(12):693938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–13. (Epub 2020 Jan 30).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Novelli A, Andreani M, Biancolella M, Liberatoscioli L, Passarelli C, Colona VL, et al. HLA allele frequencies and susceptibility to COVID-19 in a group of 99 Italian patients. HLA. 2020;96(5):610–4. (Epub 2020 Sep 3).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chao JY, Derespina KR, Herold BC, Goldman DL, Aldrich M, Weingarten J, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized and critically Ill children and adolescents with coronavirus disease 2019 at a tertiary care medical center in New York City. J Pediatr. 2020;223:14-19.e2. (Epub 2020 May 11).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Harrison AG, Lin T, Wang P. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and pathogenesis. Trends Immunol. 2020;41(12):1100–15. (Epub 2020 Oct 14).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Q, Bastard P, Human Genetic Effort COVID, Cobat A, Casanova JL. Human genetic and immunological determinants of critical COVID-19 pneumonia. Nature. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Colona VL, Biancolella M, Novelli A, Novelli G. Will GWAS eventually allow the identification of genomic biomarkers for COVID-19 severity and mortality? J Clin Invest. 2021;131(23):e155011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang L, Yao Q, Gu X, Wang Q, Ren L, Wang Y, et al. 1-year outcomes in hospital survivors with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):747–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sudre CH, Murray B, Varsavsky T, Graham MS, Penfold RS, Bowyer RC, et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med. 2021; 27(4):626–631. Epub 2021 Mar 10. Erratum in: Nat Med. 2021; 27(6):1116.

  35. Visco V, Vitale C, Rispoli A, Izzo C, Virtuoso N, Ferruzzi GJ, et al. Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: Involvement and Interactions between respiratory, cardiovascular and nervous systems. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Fraser E. Persistent pulmonary disease after acute covid-19. BMJ. 2021;21(373):n1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Grist JT, Chen M, Collier GJ, Raman B, Abueid G, McIntyre A, et al. Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI abnormalities in dyspneic patients 3 months after COVID-19 pneumonia: preliminary results. Radiology. 2021;301(1):E353–60. (Epub 2021 May 25).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Torres-Castro R, Vasconcello-Castillo L, Alsina-Restoy X, Solis-Navarro L, Burgos F, Puppo H, et al. Respiratory function in patients post-infection by COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pulmonology. 2021;27(4):328–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, Madhavan MV, McGroder C, Stevens JS, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):601–15. (Epub 2021 Mar 22).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Burgess LC, Venugopalan L, Badger J, Street T, Alon G, Jarvis JC, et al. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the recovery of people with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit: a narrative review. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(3):jrm00164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Rodríguez-Jiménez J, Fuensalida-Novo S, Palacios-Ceña M, Gómez-Mayordomo V, Florencio LL, et al. Myalgia as a symptom at hospital admission by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection is associated with persistent musculoskeletal pain as long-term post-COVID sequelae: a case-control study. Pain. 2021;162(12):2832–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Farr E, Wolfe AR, Deshmukh S, Rydberg L, Soriano R, Walter JM, et al. Diaphragm dysfunction in severe COVID-19 as determined by neuromuscular ultrasound. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8(8):1745–9. (Epub 2021 Jul 11).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rodriguez B, Nansoz S, Cameron DR, Z’Graggen WJ. Is myopathy part of long-Covid? Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132(6):1241–2. (Epub 2021 Mar 26).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Silva Andrade B, Siqueira S, de Assis Soares WR, de Souza RF, Santos NO, Dos Santos FA, et al. Long-COVID and post-COVID health complications: an up-to-date review on clinical conditions and their possible molecular mechanisms. Viruses. 2021;13(4):700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Stöbe S, Richter S, Seige M, Stehr S, Laufs U, Hagendorff A. Echocardiographic characteristics of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109(12):1549–66. (Epub 2020 Aug 14).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416–27. (Epub 2021 Apr 6).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Garcia-Azorin D, Layos-Romero A, Porta-Etessam J, Membrilla JA, Caronna E, Gonzalez-Martinez A, et al. Post-COVID-19 persistent headache: a multicentric 9-months follow-up study of 905 patients. Cephalalgia. 2022;15:3331024211068074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xydakis MS, Albers MW, Holbrook EH, Lyon DM, Shih RY, Frasnelli JA, et al. Post-viral effects of COVID-19 in the olfactory system and their implications. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(9):753–61. (Epub 2021 Jul 30).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mazzatenta A, Montagnini C, Brasacchio A, Sartucci F, Neri G. Electrophysiological and olfactometric evaluation of long-term COVID-19. Physiol Rep. 2021;9(18):e14992.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Guedj E, Lazarini F, Morbelli S, Ceccaldi M, Hautefort C, Kas A, et al. Long COVID and the brain network of Proust’s madeleine: targeting the olfactory pathway. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(9):1196–8. (Epub 2021 May 17).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Graham EL, Clark JR, Orban ZS, Lim PH, Szymanski AL, Taylor C, et al. Persistent neurologic symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in non-hospitalized Covid-19 “long haulers.” Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8(5):1073–85. (Epub 2021 Mar 30).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. MacIntosh BJ, Ji X, Chen JJ, Gilboa A, Roudaia E, Sekuler AB, Gao F, et al. Brain structure and function in people recovering from COVID-19 after hospital discharge or self-isolation: a longitudinal observational study protocol. CMAJ Open. 2021;9(4):E1114–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Lorkiewicz P, Waszkiewicz N. Biomarkers of Post-COVID depression. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18):4142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Raahimi MM, Kane A, Moore CE, Alareed AW. Late onset of Guillain-Barré syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection: part of “long COVID-19 syndrome”? BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(1):e240178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kakumoto T, Kobayashi S, Yuuki H, Kainaga M, Shirota Y, Hamada M, et al. Cranial nerve involvement and dysautonomia in post-COVID-19 Guillain-Barré syndrome. Intern Med. 2021;60(21):3477–80. (Epub 2021 Aug 24).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Reyes-Bueno JA, García-Trujillo L, Urbaneja P, Ciano-Petersen NL, Postigo-Pozo MJ, Martínez-Tomás C, et al. Miller-fisher syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(9):1759–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Salihefendic N, Zildzic M, Huseinagic H. Ischemic vasculitis as a cause of brain disorder’s in patients with long Covid: case report. Med Arch. 2021;75(6):471–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Barizien N, Le Guen M, Russel S, Touche P, Huang F, Vallée A. Clinical characterization of dysautonomia in long COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Al-Kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, Qusti S, Alshammari EM, Gyebi GA, Batiha GE. Covid-19-induced dysautonomia: a menace of sympathetic storm. ASN Neuro. 2021;13:17590914211057636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Bo HX, Li W, Yang Y, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al. Posttraumatic stress symptoms and attitude toward crisis mental health services among clinically stable patients with COVID-19 in China. Psychol Med. 2021;51(6):1052–3. (Epub 2020 Mar 27).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gilio L, Galifi G, Centonze D, Stampanoni BM. Case report: overlap between long covid and functional neurological disorders. Front Neurol. 2022;28(12):811276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wu Y, Xu X, Chen Z, Duan J, Hashimoto K, Yang L, et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:18–22. (Epub 2020 Mar 30).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Azizi SA, Azizi SA. Neurological injuries in COVID-19 patients: direct viral invasion or a bystander injury after infection of epithelial/endothelial cells. J Neurovirol. 2020;26(5):631–41. (Epub 2020 Sep 2).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kanberg N, Simrén J, Edén A, Andersson LM, Nilsson S, Ashton NJ, et al. Neurochemical signs of astrocytic and neuronal injury in acute COVID-19 normalizes during long-term follow-up. EBioMedicine. 2021;70: 103512. (Epub 2021 Jul 29).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Carroll E, Neumann H, Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Lighter J, Czeisler BM, Melmed K, et al. Post-COVID-19 inflammatory syndrome manifesting as refractory status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2020;61(10):e135–9. (Epub 2020 Sep 18).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhou Z, Kang H, Li S, Zhao X. Understanding the neurotropic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2: from neurological manifestations of COVID-19 to potential neurotropic mechanisms. J Neurol. 2020;267(8):2179–84. (Epub 2020 May 26).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Matschke J, Lütgehetmann M, Hagel C, Sperhake JP, Schröder AS, Edler C, et al. Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: a post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(11):919–29. (Epub 2020 Oct 5).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Douaud G, Lee S, Alfaro-Almagro F, Arthofer C, Wang C, McCarthy P, et al. SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank. Nature. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Nolen LT, Mukerji SS, Mejia NI. Post-acute neurological consequences of COVID-19: an unequal burden. Nat Med. 2022;28(1):20–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. The Lancet Neurology. Long COVID: understanding the neurological effects. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(4):247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Jarrott B, Head R, Pringle KG, Lumbers ER, Martin JH. “LONG COVID”-A hypothesis for understanding the biological basis and pharmacological treatment strategy. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022;10(1):e00911.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Petrillo S, Piermarini E, Pastore A, Vasco G, Schirinzi T, Carrozzo R, et al. Nrf2-inducers counteract neurodegeneration in frataxin-silenced motor neurons: disclosing new therapeutic targets for Friedreich’s ataxia. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Petrillo S, Schirinzi T, Di Lazzaro G, D’Amico J, Colona VL, Bertini E, et al. Systemic activation of Nrf2 pathway in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35(1):180–4. (Epub 2019 Nov 4).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Satoh T, Trudler D, Oh CK, Lipton SA. Potential therapeutic use of the rosemary diterpene carnosic acid for alzheimer’s disease, parkinson’s disease, and long-COVID through NRF2 activation to counteract the NLRP3 inflammasome. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(1):124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Paul BD, Lemle MD, Komaroff AL, Snyder SH. Redox imbalance links COVID-19 and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(34):e2024358118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Rovere Querini P, De Lorenzo R, Conte C, Brioni E, Lanzani C, Yacoub MR, et al. Post-COVID-19 follow-up clinic: depicting chronicity of a new disease. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(9-S):22–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Kell DB, Laubscher GJ, Pretorius E. A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications. Biochem J. 2022;479(4):537–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Casanova JL, Abel L. Mechanisms of viral inflammation and disease in humans. Science. 2021;374(6571):1080–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Anastassopoulou C, Gkizarioti Z, Patrinos GP, Tsakris A. Human genetic factors associated with susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease severity. Hum Genom. 2020;14(1):40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Andreakos E, Abel L, Vinh DC, Kaja E, Drolet BA, Zhang Q, et al. A global effort to dissect the human genetic basis of resistance to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Immunol. 2021; Epub 2021 Oct 18. Erratum in: Nat Immunol. 2021 Nov 24.

  81. Zhang Q, Bastard P, Effort CHG, Cobat A, Casanova JL. Human genetic and immunological determinants of critical COVID-19 pneumonia. Nature. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Fink-Baldauf IM, Stuart WD, Brewington JJ, Guo M, Maeda Y. CRISPRi links COVID-19 GWAS loci to LZTFL1 and RAVER1. EBioMedicine. 2022;75:103806. (Epub 2022 Jan 6).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative. Mapping the human genetic architecture of COVID-19. Nature. 2021;600(7889):472–477. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

  84. Chamnanphon M, Pongpanich M, Suttichet TB, Jantarabenjakul W, Torvorapanit P, Putcharoen O, Sodsai P, Phokaew C, Hirankarn N, Chariyavilaskul P, Shotelersuk V. Host genetic factors of COVID-19 susceptibility and disease severity in a Thai population. J Hum Genet. 2022;11:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Sánchez EG, Pérez-Núñez D, Revilla Y. Mechanisms of entry and endosomal pathway of African swine fever virus. Vaccines (Basel). 2017;5(4):42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Regan JA, Abdulrahim JW, Bihlmeyer NA, Haynes C, Kwee LC, Patel MR, Shah SH. Phenome-wide association study of severe COVID-19 genetic risk variants. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(5):e024004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Lin M, Tseng HK, Trejaut JA, Lee HL, Loo JH, Chu CC, et al. Association of HLA class I with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. BMC Med Genet. 2003;12(4):9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Cho JH, Gregersen PK. Genomics and the multifactorial nature of human autoimmune disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(17):1612–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Dutta M, Dutta P, Medhi S, Borkakoty B, Biswas D. Polymorphism of HLA class I and class II alleles in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infected population of Assam Northeast India. J Med Virol. 2018;90(5):854–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ma Y, Yuan B, Yi J, Zhuang R, Wang J, Zhang Y, et al. The genetic polymorphisms of HLA are strongly correlated with the disease severity after Hantaan virus infection in the Chinese Han population. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:308237. (Epub 2012 Oct 8).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Migliorini F, Torsiello E, Spiezia F, Oliva F, Tingart M, Maffulli N. Association between HLA genotypes and COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and progression: a comprehensive review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(1):84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Weiner J, Suwalski P, Holtgrewe M, Rakitko A, Thibeault C, Müller M, et al. Increased risk of severe clinical course of COVID-19 in carriers of HLA-C*04:01. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;40:101099. (Epub 2021 Sep 2).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Latini A, Agolini E, Novelli A, Borgiani P, Giannini R, Gravina P, et al. COVID-19 and genetic variants of protein involved in the SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host cells. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(9):1010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181(2):271-280.e8. (Epub 2020 Mar 5).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. David A, Parkinson N, Peacock TP, Pairo-Castineira E, Khanna T, Cobat A, et al. A common TMPRSS2 variant has a protective effect against severe COVID-19. Curr Res Transl Med. 2022;70(2):103333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Pandey RK, Srivastava A, Singh PP, Chaubey G. Genetic association of TMPRSS2 rs2070788 polymorphism with COVID-19 case fatality rate among Indian populations. Infect Genet Evol. 2022;98:105206. (Epub 2022 Jan 5).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Novelli G, Liu J, Biancolella M, Alonzi T, Novelli A, Patten JJ, et al. Inhibition of HECT E3 ligases as potential therapy for COVID-19. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(4):310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Freitas AT, Calhau C, Antunes G, Araújo B, Bandeira M, Barreira S, et al. Vitamin D-related polymorphisms and vitamin D levels as risk biomarkers of COVID-19 disease severity. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20837.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Chauss D, Freiwald T, McGregor R, Yan B, Wang L, Nova-Lamperti E, et al. Autocrine vitamin D signaling switches off pro-inflammatory programs of TH1 cells. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(1):62–74. (Epub 2021 Nov 11).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Hung AM, Shah SC, Bick AG, Yu Z, Chen HC, Hunt CM, et al. APOL1 Risk variants, acute kidney injury, and death in participants with African ancestry hospitalized With COVID-19 from the million veteran program. JAMA Intern Med. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Stravalaci M, Pagani I, Paraboschi EM, Pedotti M, Doni A, Scavello F, et al. Recognition and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 by humoral innate immunity pattern recognition molecules. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(2):275–86. (Epub 2022 Jan 31).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Schultze JL, Aschenbrenner AC. COVID-19 and the human innate immune system. Cell. 2021;184(7):1671–92. (Epub 2021 Feb 16).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Beutler B. Innate immunity: an overview. Mol Immunol. 2004;40(12):845–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Mantovani S, Daga S, Fallerini C, Baldassarri M, Benetti E, Picchiotti N, et al. Rare variants in Toll-like receptor 7 results in functional impairment and downregulation of cytokine-mediated signaling in COVID-19 patients. Genes Immun. 2022;23(1):51–6. (Epub 2021 Dec 24).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Fallerini C, Daga S, Mantovani S, Benetti E, Picchiotti N, Francisci D, et al. Association of toll-like receptor 7 variants with life-threatening COVID-19 disease in males: findings from a nested case-control study. Elife. 2021;2(10):e67569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Asano T, Boisson B, Onodi F, Matuozzo D, Moncada-Velez M, Maglorius Renkilaraj MRL, et al. X-linked recessive TLR7 deficiency in ~1% of men under 60 years old with life-threatening COVID-19. Sci Immunol. 2021;6(62):eab14348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Arkin LM, Moon JJ, Tran JM, Asgari S, O’Farrelly C, Casanova JL, et al. From your nose to your toes: a review of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic-associated pernio. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(12):2791–6. (Epub 2021 Jul 15).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Bastard P, Rosen LB, Zhang Q, Michailidis E, Hoffmann HH, Zhang Y, et al. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020;370(6515):eabd4585.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Zhang Q, Bastard P, Liu Z, Le Pen J, Moncada-Velez M, Chen J, et al. Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020;370(6515):eabd4570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Carapito R, Li R, Helms J, Carapito C, Gujja S, Rolli V, et al. Identification of driver genes for critical forms of COVID-19 in a deeply phenotyped young patient cohort. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(628):7521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Bastard P, Galerne A, Lefevre-Utile A, Briand C, Baruchel A, Durand P, et al. Different clinical presentations and outcomes of disseminated varicella in children with primary and acquired immunodeficiencies. Front Immunol. 2020;5(11):595478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Zhou S, Butler-Laporte G, Nakanishi T, Morrison DR, Afilalo J, Afilalo M, et al. A Neanderthal OAS1 isoform protects individuals of European ancestry against COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):659–67. (Epub 2021 Feb 25).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Magg T, Okano T, Koenig LM, Boehmer DFR, Schwartz SL, Inoue K, et al. Heterozygous OAS1 gain-of-function variants cause an autoinflammatory immunodeficiency. Sci Immunol. 2021;6(60):eabf9564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Huffman JE, Butler-Laporte G, Khan A, Pairo-Castineira E, Drivas TG, Peloso GM, et al. Multi-ancestry fine mapping implicates OAS1 splicing in risk of severe COVID-19. Nat Genet. 2022;54(2):125–7. (Epub 2022 Jan 13).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Shelton JF, Shastri AJ, Fletez-Brant K, 23andMe COVID-19 Team, Aslibekyan S, Auton A. The UGT2A1/UGT2A2 locus is associated with COVID-19-related loss of smell or taste. Nat Genet. 2022;54(2):121–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. e!Ensembl (2022). Retrieved 19/04, 2022 from

  117. Kantarcioglu B, Iqbal O, Lewis J, Carter CA, Singh M, Lievano F, et al. An Update on the status of vaccine development for SARS-CoV-2 including variants. Practical considerations for COVID-19 special populations. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022;28:10760296211056648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Barda N, Dagan N, Ben-Shlomo Y, Kepten E, Waxman J, Ohana R, et al. Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a nationwide setting. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1078–90. (Epub 2021 Aug 25).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Levine-Tiefenbrun M, Yelin I, Alapi H, Herzel E, Kuint J, Chodick G, et al. Waning of SARS-CoV-2 booster viral-load reduction effectiveness. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(3):141–154. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Erratum in: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Feb 23.

  121. Choi A, Koch M, Wu K, Chu L, Ma L, Hill A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant mRNA vaccine boosters in healthy adults: an interim analysis. Nat Med. 2021Nov;27(11):2025–31. (Epub 2021 Sep 15).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Barda N, Dagan N, Cohen C, Hernán MA, Lipsitch M, Kohane IS, et al. Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study. Lancet. 2021;398(10316):2093–100. (Epub 2021 Oct 29).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Scobie HM, Johnson AG, Suthar AB, Severson R, Alden NB, Balter S, et al. Monitoring incidence of COVID-19 Cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, by vaccination status-13 U.S. jurisdictions, April 4-July 17, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(37):1284–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Muthukrishnan J, Vardhan V, Mangalesh S, Koley M, Shankar S, Yadav AK, et al. Vaccination status and COVID-19 related mortality: a hospital based cross sectional study. Med J Armed Forces India. 2021;77(Suppl 2):S278–82. (Epub 2021 Jul 26).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Klein NP, Stockwell MS, Demarco M, Gaglani M, Kharbanda AB, Irving SA, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in preventing COVID-19-associated emergency department and urgent care encounters and hospitalizations among nonimmunocompromised children and adolescents aged 5-17 years - VISION network, 10 States, April 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(9):352–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Heudel P, Favier B, Solodky ML, Assaad S, Chaumard N, Tredan O, et al. Survival and risk of COVID-19 after SARS-COV-2 vaccination in a series of 2391 cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2022;10(165):174–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Citu IM, Citu C, Gorun F, Sas I, Tomescu L, Neamtu R, et al. Immunogenicity following administration of BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccines in the pregnant population during the third trimester. Viruses. 2022;14(2):307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Busic N, Lucijanic T, Barsic B, Luksic I, Busic I, Kurdija G, et al. Vaccination provides protection from respiratory deterioration and death among hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Differences between vector and mRNA vaccines. J Med Virol. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Ferdinands JM, Rao S, Dixon BE, Mitchell PK, DeSilva MB, Irving SA, et al. Waning 2-dose and 3-dose effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19-associated emergency department and urgent care encounters and hospitalizations among adults during periods of delta and omicron variant predominance - VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(7):255–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. WHO. World Health Organization. “”.2022; Retrieved 19/04, 2022, from

  131. Dragic T, Litwin V, Allaway GP, Martin SR, Huang Y, Nagashima KA, et al. HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5. Nature. 1996;381(6584):667–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Haldane JBS, Jayakar SD. Equilibria under natural selection. J Genet. 1964;59:29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Luzzatto L. Genetics of red cells and susceptibility to malaria. Blood. 1979;54(5):961–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Brenner S, Jacob F, Meselson M. An unstable intermediate carrying information from genes to ribosomes for protein synthesis. Nature. 1961;13(190):576–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Bersani GL. altra epidemia [The parallel epidemic.]. Riv Psichiatr. 2022;57(2):101–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Mira Nagel for permission to reproduce the cartoon presented in Figure 1. We are grateful for the assistance given by Dr. Francesca Pisanu for her help with the editing and organization of the manuscript.


This study was also supported in part by a grant of Regione Lazio (Italy, Progetti di Gruppi di Ricerca 2020 A0375-2020–36663 GecoBiomark) and Rome Foundation (Italy, Prot 317A/I) to GN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JKVR conceived the manuscript, wrote the historical and transition part and edited the paper. JLW edited the manuscript. VLC wrote the introduction and clinical manifestations sections, conceived and edited Fig. 2, and revised the manuscript. GN and MB wrote the genetic susceptibility part, conceived Fig. 2 and revised the paper. LL wrote the outlook section and performed review and revision of the paper. RMS wrote the characteristics of available vaccines paragraph. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Novelli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biancolella, M., Colona, V.L., Mehrian-Shai, R. et al. COVID-19 2022 update: transition of the pandemic to the endemic phase. Hum Genomics 16, 19 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: