Skip to main content

A genome-wide association study identifies candidate genes for sleep disturbances in depressed individuals

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to identify candidate loci and genes related to sleep disturbances in depressed individuals and clarify the co-occurrence of sleep disturbances and depression from the genetic perspective.

Methods

The study subjects (including 58,256 self-reported depressed individuals and 6,576 participants with PHQ-9 score ≥ 10, respectively) were collected from the UK Biobank, which were determined based on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and self-reported depression status, respectively. Sleep related traits included chronotype, insomnia, snoring and daytime dozing. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of sleep related traits in depressed individuals were conducted by PLINK 2.0 adjusting age, sex, Townsend deprivation index and 10 principal components as covariates. The CAUSALdb database was used to explore the mental traits associated with the candidate genes identified by the GWAS.

Results

GWAS detected 15 loci significantly associated with chronotype in the subjects with self-reported depression, such as rs12736689 at RNASEL (P = 1.00 × 10− 09), rs509476 at RGS16 (P = 1.58 × 10− 09) and rs1006751 at RFX4 (P = 1.54 × 10− 08). 9 candidate loci were identified in the subjects with PHQ-9 ≥ 10, of which 2 loci were associated with insomnia such as rs115379847 at EVC2 (P = 3.50 × 10− 08), and 7 loci were associated with daytime dozing, such as rs140876133 at SMYD3 (P = 3.88 × 10− 08) and rs139156969 at ROBO2 (P = 3.58 × 10− 08). Multiple identified genes, such as RNASEL, RGS16, RFX4 and ROBO2 were reported to be associated with chronotype, depression or cognition in previous studies.

Conclusion

Our study identified several candidate genes related to sleep disturbances in depressed individuals, which provided new clues for understanding the biological mechanism underlying the co-occurrence of depression and sleep disorders.

Introduction

Depression is a common and debilitating mental illness characterized by persistent bad mood. It has been widely recognized as the leading cause of disability in the world, with an estimated 300 million people being affected by it during their lifespan [1, 2]. Sleep disturbances are a core symptoms of depression with diverse manifestations, including insomnia, daytime dozing and chronotype, which could result in poor sleep efficiency and quality [3]. In addition, the incidence of sleep disturbances rises with age, and approximately 60% of older adults complain of sleep problems, which in turn can increase the risk of depression [4, 5]. Surprisingly, sleep disorders might even affect the outcome of depression, as they are closely associated with the severity of depression, bad treatment response and even relapse of depression [4, 6]. The co-existence of sleep disturbances and depression undoubtedly bring heavy burden to the social economy and health care system.

There is convincing evidence that a bidirectional relationship exists among depression and sleep disturbances. Indeed, the frequency of sleep disturbances tends to be higher in depressed patients than that in healthy individuals, and more than 90% patients with depression complain of poor sleep quality [7]. It was estimated that 75% depressed individuals experienced insomnia, and 40% youngsters and 10% elderly people with depression suffered from hypersomnia [8]. A study reported a statistically significant correlation between depressive symptoms and sleep quality in adults with depression [9]. Moreover, insomnia with short sleep could indirectly increase the risk of suicide by affecting the development of depression [10]. Numerous meta-analyses have shown that individuals with insomnia symptoms are more likely to suffer depression than those without sleep problems, and insomnia could largely predict the onset and development of depression [11, 12]. Interestingly, Roman et al. found that sleep disturbances could gradually attenuate the sensitivity of serotonergic receptor, which is associated with the reduction of cognitive function and an increased risk of depression [13]. Although the complex bidirectional relationship between sleep disturbances and development of depression has been confirmed, the exploration of the underlying biological mechanisms of the co-occurrence of sleep disorders and depression is still limited.

A growing number of studies have indicated that genetic factor may exert important influence on the development of sleep disturbances and depression [1, 14,15,16]. The heritability of sleep disturbances and depression has been estimated at about 17–45% and 31–42%, respectively [15, 17]. Lane et al. identified several candidate loci and genes associated with insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness, and replicated a locus significantly related to sleep duration by the genome-wide association study (GWAS) [16]. In addition, 15 loci were found to have genome-wide significant association with the self-reported morningness, and 7 loci mapped to the circadian genes, such as RGS16 and VIP [14]. Moreover, a meta-analysis of three GWASs of depression has also indicated the polygenic trait of depression, and identified 102 variants and 269 genes that were statistically associated with depression [1]. Howard and his colleague conducted GWASs of three depression related phenotypes in the UK Biobank cohort, including broad depression, probable major depressive disorder (MDD) and International Classification of Diseases-code MDD, and they observed 17 genetic variants significantly related to depression [18]. Collectively, these studies suggested that sleep disturbances and depression have high heritability and complicated genetic architecture. It is noteworthy that research on the genetic factors related to sleep disturbances in depressed individuals and comorbid risk factors for both disorders is limited.

In the present study, GWASs of four sleep disturbance phenotypes were conducted in depressed samples from the UK Biobank. Then, the CAUSALdb database were used to replicate and validate whether the identified genes in our GWAS also showing genetic effects on sleep and other mental disorders in generally populations. Our results may reveal the underling genetic mechanism of high comorbidity of sleep disturbances and depression.

Materials and methods

UK Biobank cohort

The analysis data were extracted from the UK Biobank (application 46,478), a large-scale population based prospective cohort involving more than 500,000 subjects aged 40–69 years between 2006 and 2010 [19]. The demographics, lifestyle and health-related records of all participants were obtained via questionnaire, interview and physical measurements. In addition, the collected specimens were mainly used for biochemical detection and genome-wide genotyping, including blood, urine and saliva. All individuals gave informed consent. Our study was conducted under the approval of the UK Biobank and obtained the health-related information of participants involving depression and sleep status and genotyping data of each individual.

UK Biobank phenotypes of depression and sleep

The depression was evaluated based on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and self-reported depression status [20]. PHQ-9 is a reliable tool for assessing the severity of depressive disorder, with a total score of 0–27. Notably, PHQ-9 ≥ 10 represents moderate to severe depression and its sensitivity and specificity for major depression are 88% and 88%, respectively [20]. In addition, self-reported depression was defined according to the code 1286 from ID 20,002, code 3, 4 or 5 from ID 20,126 and code 11 from ID 20,544 of UK Biobank. In the present study, individuals with PHQ-9 ≥ 10 or self-reported depression were selected as depression cases. More detailed definition of depression has been described elsewhere [21].

The sleep-related phenotypes in this study included chronotype, insomnia, snoring and daytime dozing. Chronotype, commonly named circadian preference, represents a person’s tendency to sleep early or late [22]. In the UK Biobank, participants’ chronotype was assessed by the code 100,342 from ID 1180. Insomnia means a person who has trouble in initiating or maintaining sleep [11]. The insomnia (MIM code: 60,072) was evaluated by the code 100,343 from ID 1200. Moreover, snoring (MIM code: 107,650) refers to the unpleasant inspiratory sound caused by the upper airway during sleep [23]. The snoring was assessed by the code 100,345 from ID 1210. Daytime dozing (MIM code:161,400) represents a person who tends to fall drowsy or asleep during normal waking hours [24]. It was evaluated by the code 100,346 from ID 1220. The more detailed information of sleep-related phenotypes’ definition is shown in the Supplementary Materials.

UK Biobank genotyping, imputation and quality control

The genotyping process, array design and quality control were described elsewhere in more detail [25]. Briefly, a total of 488,377 individuals were genotyped via either the UK Bileve array or the UK Biobank axiom array. The genotyping data were then imputed by the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) reference panel [26] and a merged UK10K and 1000 Genomes phase 3 reference panels [27]. Quality control (QC) included removal of individuals who reported sex was out of line with genetic sex, who were genotyped but not imputed, who withdrew their consents and who were genetic relatedness based on self-reported “White British” (UK Biobank field ID: 21,000). The participants with genetic relatedness were removed using KING software in the UK Biobank [25, 28]. In the present study, we inferred 376,806 genetically unrelated participants with kinship coefficient less than 0.088 using the KING option ‘‘–unrelated’’ [28, 29].

Genome-wide association study analysis

GWASs of the four sleep traits in depression samples (self-reported depressed participants: N = 58,256; subjects with PHQ-9 score ≥ 10: N = 6,576) were performed by the PLINK2 using generalized linear model with the imputed additive genetic effects, respectively [30]. In the association analyses, age, sex, Townsend deprivation index (TDI), and 10 principal components (PC) of population structure were used as covariates. An additional QC process was carried out to obtain high-quality SNPs. The exclusion criteria of SNPs were as follows: SNPs with call rate < 0.90, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium exact test P-values < 0.001, minor allele frequency < 0.01, SNP-level missingness > 0.1 or individual-level missingness > 0.1. Loci with significant correlation signals were detected by P < 5.0 × 10–8. Manhattan plots and QQ plots of GWAS results were visualized in R (4.0.3) with CMplot (https://github.com/YinLiLin/CMplot).

Exploring the mental traits related to identified candidate genes

CAUSALdb database was employed to explore the mental traits associated with the genes identified by our GWAS [31]. The database covers the most comprehensive GWAS summary data so far and identifies the potential causal genetic variants of traits/diseases via uniformly handling fine-mapping (http://mulinlab.org/causaldb/index.html). In addition, the results of related traits were confined to the European population in our study.

Results

Characteristics of study subjects

In our study, about 5,938 − 58,256 participants remained in GWAS analysis. As indicated by Table 1, the total sample of each sleep phenotype represents the sample size of each GWAS analysis. Among 58,256 self-reported depressed participants, 52,688 individuals (34,792 women, 17,896 men) completed chronotype assessment, and mean age (SD) was 55.74 (7.74) years old. Among 6,576 subjects with PHQ-9 score ≥ 10, 5,940 individuals (3,753 women, 2,187 men) completed chronotype assessment, and mean age (SD) was 53.12 (7.62) years old. More detailed characteristics of subjects are exhibited in the Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of study subjects from the UK Biobank

GWAS results of sleep traits in self-reported depressed subjects

In the self-reported depressed individuals, GWAS detected 15 loci significantly associated with the chronotype, such as rs12736689 and rs12743617 located in RNASEL (MIM code: 180435, P = 1.00 × 10− 09, P = 1.40 × 10− 09, respectively), rs509476 and rs1144566 mapped to RGS16 (MIM code: 602514, P = 1.58 × 10− 09, P = 1.80 × 10− 09, respectively). Notably, 7 of 15 loci were mapped to RFX4 (MIM code: 603958), such as rs1006751 (P = 1.54 × 10− 08), rs4964181 (P = 2.73 × 10− 08) and rs4964472 (P = 3.42 × 10− 08). There were no significant loci correlated with insomnia or daytime dozing or snoring. GWAS results of sleep disturbances in self-reported depressed subjects are exhibited in the Table 2; Figs. 1 and 2.

Table 2 GWAS results of sleep disturbances in the depressed individuals meeting genome-wide significance
Figure 1
figure 1

Results of genome-wide association study of chronotype and daytime dozing in self-reported depression individuals

(A) (C) exhibited Manhattan plots of chronotype, daytime dozing, respectively. From the center, the first circle shows –log10p value of each variant. The second circle represents the chromosome density. Red plots indicate P < 5.0 × 10–8. (B) (D) exhibited QQ plots of chronotype, daytime dozing, respectively. A graphical representation of the deviation of the observed p values from the null hypothesis: the observed p values for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) are sorted from largest to smallest and plotted against expected values from a theoretical χ2-distribution

Figure 2
figure 2

Results of genome-wide association study of insomnia and snoring in self-reported depression individuals

(A) (C) exhibited Manhattan plots of insomnia and snoring, respectively. From the center, the first circle shows –log10p value of each variant. The second circle represents the chromosome density. Red plots indicate P < 5.0 × 10–8. (B) (D) exhibited QQ plots of insomnia and snoring, respectively. A graphical representation of the deviation of the observed p values from the null hypothesis: the observed p values for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) are sorted from largest to smallest and plotted against expected values from a theoretical χ2-distribution

GWAS results of sleep traits in the subjects with PHQ-9 ≥ 10

In the participants with PHQ-9 ≥ 10, GWAS identified 2 candidate loci associated with insomnia, including rs115379847 mapped to EVC2 (MIM code: 607261, P = 3.50 × 10− 08). Additionally, 7 loci were identified for daytime dozing, such as rs140876133 located in SMYD3 (MIM code: 608783, P = 3.88 × 10− 08), rs139156969 and rs143411328 mapped to ROBO2 (MIM code: 602431, P = 3.58 × 10− 08, P = 3.70 × 10− 08, respectively). We did not detect significant locus associated with chronotype or snoring. The GWAS results of sleep disturbances in the subjects with PHQ-9 ≥ 10 are exhibited in the Table 2; Figs. 3 and 4

Figure 3
figure 3

Results of genome-wide association study of chronotype and daytime dozing in the subjects with PHQ-9 ≥ 10

(A) (C) exhibited Manhattan plots of chronotype, daytime dozing, respectively. From the center, the first circle shows –log10p value of each variant. The second circle represents the chromosome density. Red plots indicate P < 5.0 × 10–8. (B) (D) exhibited QQ plots of chronotype, daytime dozing, respectively. A graphical representation of the deviation of the observed p values from the null hypothesis: the observed p values for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) are sorted from largest to smallest and plotted against expected values from a theoretical χ2-distribution

Figure 4
figure 4

Results of genome-wide association study of insomnia and snoring in the subjects with PHQ-9 ≥ 10

(A) (C) exhibited Manhattan plots of insomnia and snoring, respectively. From the center, the first circle shows –log10p value of each variant. The second circle represents the chromosome density. Red plots indicate P < 5.0 × 10–8. (B) (D) exhibited QQ plots of insomnia and snoring, respectively. A graphical representation of the deviation of the observed p values from the null hypothesis: the observed p values for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) are sorted from largest to smallest and plotted against expected values from a theoretical χ2-distribution

Mental traits related to identified genes in published studies

Multiple identified genes were also reported to be associated with mental traits in the published studies, such as RGS16 and RNASEL for chronotype [14, 16, 32,33,34], cognitive performance [35] and neuroticism [36]. RFX4 was associated with both chronotype and depression [34]. Additionally, ROBO2 was related to the number of depression episodes and chronotype [34]. The main results of candidate genes-related mental traits can be found in Table 3

Table 3 The traits associated with identified genes in the published studies

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, limited efforts have been paid to reveal the high comorbidity of sleep disturbances and depression from the genetic perspective. In the present study, using the well-established UK Biobank cohort, we explored the susceptibility genes associated with sleep disorders in depressed individuals by GWAS. We identified several candidate genes for sleep disorders in the subjects with depression, such as RFX4, RGS16 and ROBO2.

We observed that regulatory factor X4 (RFX4) was significantly associated with chronotype in the self-reported depressed individuals. Furthermore, previous GWAS systematically explored the genetic architecture in 2,965 complex traits and found that RFX4 may be associated with depression and chronotype [34]. RFX4 is widely expressed in the brain, especially in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) [37]. SCN is located in the hypothalamus directly above the optic chiasm on both sides of the third ventricle, which is also regarded as the central pacemaker point of the circadian clock, suggesting that RFX4 may participate in the regulation of circadian rhythm patterns [38]. Interestingly, RFX4 could be triggered by the light exposure in a subjective night-specific pattern, which is deemed as the features of several circadian genes in the SCN [38]. In addition, circadian rhythm is closely correlated with chronotype. Precisely, the chronotype differences are induced by the differences in circadian rhythm that, which regulate numerous behavioral and physiological in 24-hour cycles [39]. Thus, RFX4 may exert essential influences on the chronotype in depressed subjects via regulating their circadian systems

Regulator of G protein signaling 16 (RGS16) and Ribonuclease L (RNASEL) were also detected to be statistically correlated with chronotype in depressed participants. RGS16 is located in midline and intralaminar and relay nuclei of the thalamus, as well as suprachiasmatic nucleus of hypothalamus [40]. It has been widely recognized as one of circadian genes in the SCN and exerts important influence on the circadian rhythms [32]. RGS16 could promote the synthesis of intracellular cyclic AMP in the SCN [41]. Moreover, the RGS16 ablation was able to attenuate the circadian production of cyclic AMP, giving rise to the prolongation of circadian rhythm period, which indicated the vital relationship between chronotype and RGS16 [41]. The clock-controlled RGS16 precisely regulated the cyclic AMP signaling in the SCN, which could contribute the dorsomedial SCN to maintain the normal phase relationship with the ventrolateral SCN [41]. In addition, RNASEL is adjacent to RGS16, which has been shown to have significant association with chronotype [14, 42]. Kalmbach et al. explored the genetic basis of chronotype by systematically reviewing three GWASs of chronotype, and found loci statistically associated with chronotypes in RNASEL [42]. Moreover, study supported the association between RGS16/RNASEL and neuroticism, although they are not directly related to depression [36]. Taken together, RGS16 and RNASEL, as known circadian genes, exert important impacts on the chronotype of depression individuals

Additionally, we also observed Roundabout Guidance Receptor 2 (ROBO2) was significantly associated with daytime dozing in depressed subjects. The associations between ROBO2 with depression and chronotype had been identified by Watanabe et al. [34]. Although the research on the relationship between ROBO2 and daytime dozing is limited, the association of ROBO2 and the development of dopaminergic neurons has been extensively investigated [43, 44]. ROBO2 is broadly expressed in the developing nervous system, especially in the differentiating striatum [45]. As the essential neurotransmitter in central nervous system (CNS), dopamine exerts important influences in cognitive, sleep, mood and other neuronal functions [46]. There were huge errors in the midbrain dopaminergic axon pathfinding in ROBO2 knockout mice, suggesting the critical roles of ROBO2 in the establishment of dopaminergic pathways [43]. Moreover, Gore et al. found that ROBO2 could regulate the inhibitory synaptic connectivity of ventral tegmental area, a major brain area that plays important roles in dopamine production [44]. Study reported that sleep loss could change the behaviors mainly mediated by dopamine, indicating the close relationship between dopaminergic system and sleep disturbances [47]. Therefore, ROBO2 could indirectly exert critical influences on sleep disturbances by the dopamine, and may be a novel candidate gene correlated with daytime dozing in depressed individuals

Notably, the candidate genes identified in our study may partly explain the comorbidity of sleep disorders and depression from the genetic perspective. As circadian genes, RFX4, RGS16 and RNASEL play important roles in the regulation of circadian rhythm systems [14, 38, 41]. The genetic variants at circadian genes may lead to slight changes in the biochemical feedback mechanism of the circadian clock and abnormal circadian systems [22]. Moreover, circadian rhythms play essential roles in the association between sleep disorders and depression [48]. The disruption of the circadian rhythm systems can induce sleep disturbances, which can increase vulnerability to depression [49]. In addition, ROBO2 has been established to exert an important influence on the axon guidance across the midline during the development of the CNS [50]. It also plays vital roles in the establishment of dopaminergic pathways, production of dopamine, differentiation of serotonergic neuron and the expression of serotonin transporter [43, 44, 51]. Accumulating evidence has suggested that dopamine and serotonin, neurotransmitters of the CNS, play vital roles in multiple neuronal activities including sleep, cognition and emotion [46, 52]. The dopamine dysfunction has been described as participating in the relationship between sleep disturbances and depression [53]. Moreover, serotonin could regulate the circadian function, and the disruption of serotonergic system could disturb circadian rhythm systems and increase the risk of depression [54]. Interestingly, Novati et al. found that chronic sleep deprivation could induce the changes in serotonergic receptor system, which was involved in the pathophysiology of depression [55]. Thus, RFX4, RGS16, RNASEL and ROBO2 may be the important genetic factors indirectly linked to sleep disturbances and depression via circadian rhythm or neurotransmitters.

Interestingly, we also observed EvC ciliary complex subunit 2 (EVC2) and SET and MYND domain containing 3 (SMYD3) significantly associated with sleep disturbances in depressed individuals. There was no statistical correlation between sleep disturbances with EVC2 and SMYD3 in ordinary population by surveying the CAUSALdb database. Our findings may partly reflect the different genetic factor between sleep disturbances in depressed patients and sleep disturbances in ordinary people. It is clear that depressed individuals are more prone to suffer from sleep disturbances [7]. As we mentioned above, dysregulation of neurotransmitters and disruption of circadian rhythm systems may be critical factors linking the sleep disturbances and depression. However, the exact biological mechanisms underlying the candidate genes connecting sleep disturbances with depression remain to be further elucidated.

It is noteworthy that there are several strengths in our study. On the one hand, our research identified the candidate loci and genes associated with sleep disturbances in depressed individuals, which could help us to better understand the shared genetic mechanisms of the two disorders from the genetic perspective. On the other hand, the trustworthy data was extracted from the well-established UK Biobank cohort. Moreover, the candidate genes-related traits were replicated and validated in the published studies, reflecting the credibility of our study results. In addition, our work still has some limitations. Given the study subjects were collected from the UK Biobank and were limited to “White British”, thus the findings could not be generalized to other people with different genetic background. The sleep-related phenotypes were evaluated by self-report, which could result in recall bias. Moreover, the latest whole exome sequencing (WES) data released by the UK Biobank includes more rare variants than the Human Reference Consortium (HRC) imputed genotype data, which may provide new clues for our future research.

In conclusion, our research identified some susceptibility genes associated with sleep disturbances in participants with depression. Our findings may provide novel clues for the genetic mechanism underlying sleep disturbances and depression

Data availability

The UK Biobank data are available through the UK Biobank Access Management System https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/. We will return the derived data fields following UK Biobank policy; in due course, they will be available through the UK Biobank Access Management System.

References

  1. Howard DM, Adams MJ, Clarke TK, Hafferty JD, Gibson J, Shirali M, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(3):343–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Herrman H, Kieling C, McGorry P, Horton R, Sargent J, Patel V. Reducing the global burden of depression: a Lancet-World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet (London England). 2019;393(10189):e42–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Riemann D. Insomnia and comorbid psychiatric disorders. Sleep Med. 2007;8(Suppl 4):S15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstone A, Javitz HS, Claudatos SA, Buysse DJ, Hasler BP, de Zambotti M, et al. Sleep disturbance predicts Depression symptoms in early adolescence: initial findings from the adolescent brain Cognitive Development Study. J Adolesc Health: Official Publication Soc Adolesc Med. 2020;66(5):567–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho HJ, Lavretsky H, Olmstead R, Levin MJ, Oxman MN, Irwin MR. Sleep disturbance and depression recurrence in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective study. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(12):1543–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Troxel WM, Kupfer DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Frank E, Thase ME, Miewald JM, et al. Insomnia and objectively measured sleep disturbances predict treatment outcome in depressed patients treated with psychotherapy or psychotherapy-pharmacotherapy combinations. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(4):478–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park SC, Kim JM, Jun TY, Lee MS, Kim JB, Jeong SH, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of Insomnia in Depressive disorders: the CRESCEND Study. Psychiatry Invest. 2013;10(4):373–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nutt D, Wilson S, Paterson L. Sleep disorders as core symptoms of depression. Dialog Clin Neurosci. 2008;10(3):329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aschbrenner KA, Naslund JA, Salwen-Deremer JK, Browne J, Bartels SJ, Wolfe RS et al. Sleep quality and its relationship to mental health, physical health and health behaviours among young adults with serious mental illness enrolled in a lifestyle intervention trial. Early Interv Psychiat. 2022;16(1):106–10.

  10. Anna Karin H, Hössjer O, Bellocco R, Ye W, Trolle LY, Åkerstedt T. Insomnia in the context of short sleep increases suicide risk. Sleep. 2021;44(4):zsaa245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baglioni C, Battagliese G, Feige B, Spiegelhalder K, Nissen C, Voderholzer U, et al. Insomnia as a predictor of depression: a meta-analytic evaluation of longitudinal epidemiological studies. J Affect Disord. 2011;135(1–3):10–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hertenstein E, Feige B, Gmeiner T, Kienzler C, Spiegelhalder K, Johann A, et al. Insomnia as a predictor of mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2019;43:96–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roman V, Walstra I, Luiten PG, Meerlo P. Too little sleep gradually desensitizes the serotonin 1A receptor system. Sleep. 2005;28(12):1505–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu Y, Shmygelska A, Tran D, Eriksson N, Tung JY, Hinds DA. GWAS of 89,283 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with self-reporting of being a morning person. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sullivan PF, Neale MC, Kendler KS. Genetic epidemiology of major depression: review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(10):1552–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lane JM, Liang J, Vlasac I, Anderson SG, Bechtold DA, Bowden J, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of sleep disturbance traits identify new loci and highlight shared genetics with neuropsychiatric and metabolic traits. Nat Genet. 2017;49(2):274–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wing YK, Zhang J, Lam SP, Li SX, Tang NL, Lai KY, et al. Familial aggregation and heritability of insomnia in a community-based study. Sleep Med. 2012;13(8):985–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard DM, Adams MJ, Shirali M, Clarke TK, Marioni RE, Davies G, et al. Genome-wide association study of depression phenotypes in UK Biobank identifies variants in excitatory synaptic pathways. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1470.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001779.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ye J, Wen Y, Sun X, Chu X, Li P, Cheng B, et al. Socioeconomic deprivation index is Associated with Psychiatric disorders: an observational and genome-wide Gene-by-Environment Interaction Analysis in the UK Biobank Cohort. Biol Psychiatry. 2021;89(9):888–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones SE, Lane JM, Wood AR, van Hees VT, Tyrrell J, Beaumont RN, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of chronotype in 697,828 individuals provides insights into circadian rhythms. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Michalek-Zrabkowska M, Wieckiewicz M, Macek P, Gac P, Smardz J, Wojakowska A, et al. The relationship between simple snoring and sleep bruxism: a Polysomnographic Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):8960.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lessov-Schlaggar CN, Bliwise DL, Krasnow RE, Swan GE, Reed T. Genetic association of daytime sleepiness and depressive symptoms in elderly men. Sleep. 2008;31(8):1111–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K, et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562(7726):203–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. McCarthy S, Das S, Kretzschmar W, Delaneau O, Wood AR, Teumer A, et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet. 2016;48(10):1279–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K et al. Genome-wide genetic data on ~ 500,000 UK Biobank participants. 2017:166298.

  28. Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, Daly K, Sale M, Chen WM. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(22):2867–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Manichaikul A, Palmas W, Rodriguez CJ, Peralta CA, Divers J, Guo X, et al. Population structure of hispanics in the United States: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(4):e1002640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang J, Huang D, Zhou Y, Yao H, Liu H, Zhai S, et al. CAUSALdb: a database for disease/trait causal variants identified using summary statistics of genome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D807–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones SE, Tyrrell J, Wood AR, Beaumont RN, Ruth KS, Tuke MA, et al. Genome-Wide Association Analyses in 128,266 individuals identifies new morningness and sleep duration loci. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(8):e1006125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lane JM, Vlasac I, Anderson SG, Kyle SD, Dixon WG, Bechtold DA, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel loci for chronotype in 100,420 individuals from the UK Biobank. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10889.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Watanabe K, Stringer S, Frei O, Umićević Mirkov M, de Leeuw C, Polderman TJC, et al. A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat Genet. 2019;51(9):1339–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee JJ, Wedow R, Okbay A, Kong E, Maghzian O, Zacher M, et al. Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nat Genet. 2018;50(8):1112–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Luciano M, Hagenaars SP, Davies G, Hill WD, Clarke TK, Shirali M, et al. Association analysis in over 329,000 individuals identifies 116 independent variants influencing neuroticism. Nat Genet. 2018;50(1):6–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu P, Morrison JP, Foley JF, Stumpo DJ, Ward T, Zeldin DC, et al. Conditional ablation of the RFX4 isoform 1 transcription factor: allele dosage effects on brain phenotype. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190561.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Araki R, Takahashi H, Fukumura R, Sun F, Umeda N, Sujino M, et al. Restricted expression and photic induction of a novel mouse regulatory factor X4 transcript in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(11):10237–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lack L, Bailey M, Lovato N, Wright H. Chronotype differences in circadian rhythms of temperature, melatonin, and sleepiness as measured in a modified constant routine protocol. Nat Sci Sleep. 2009;1:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Grafstein-Dunn E, Young KH, Cockett MI, Khawaja XZ. Regional distribution of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) 1, 2, 13, 14, 16, and GAIP messenger ribonucleic acids by in situ hybridization in rat brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001;88(1–2):113–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Doi M, Ishida A, Miyake A, Sato M, Komatsu R, Yamazaki F, et al. Circadian regulation of intracellular G-protein signalling mediates intercellular synchrony and rhythmicity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nat Commun. 2011;2:327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kalmbach DA, Schneider LD, Cheung J, Bertrand SJ, Kariharan T, Pack AI, et al. Genetic basis of Chronotype in humans: insights from three Landmark GWAS. Sleep. 2017;40(2):zsw048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dugan JP, Stratton A, Riley HP, Farmer WT, Mastick GS. Midbrain dopaminergic axons are guided longitudinally through the diencephalon by Slit/Robo signals. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011;46(1):347–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gore BB, Miller SM, Jo YS, Baird MA, Hoon M, Sanford CA, et al. Roundabout receptor 2 maintains inhibitory control of the adult midbrain. Elife. 2017;6:e23858.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Andrews WD, Barber M, Parnavelas JG. Slit-robo interactions during cortical development. J Anat. 2007;211(2):188–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Cornide-Petronio ME, Barreiro-Iglesias A. Role of Slit and Robo proteins in the development of dopaminergic neurons. Dev Neurosci. 2013;35(4):285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yates NJ. Schizophrenia: the role of sleep and circadian rhythms in regulating dopamine and psychosis. Rev Neurosci. 2016;27(7):669–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chellappa SL, Schröder C, Cajochen C. Chronobiology, excessive daytime sleepiness and depression: is there a link? Sleep Med. 2009;10(5):505–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pandi-Perumal SR, Monti JM, Burman D, Karthikeyan R, BaHammam AS, Spence DW, et al. Clarifying the role of sleep in depression: a narrative review. Psychiatry Res. 2020;291:113239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sundaresan V, Mambetisaeva E, Andrews W, Annan A, Knöll B, Tear G, et al. Dynamic expression patterns of Robo (Robo1 and Robo2) in the developing murine central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 2004;468(4):467–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Anitha A, Nakamura K, Yamada K, Suda S, Thanseem I, Tsujii M, et al. Genetic analyses of roundabout (ROBO) axon guidance receptors in autism. Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics: Official Publication Int Soc Psychiatric Genet. 2008;147b(7):1019–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pourhamzeh M, Moravej FG, Arabi M, Shahriari E, Mehrabi S, Ward R, et al. The roles of Serotonin in Neuropsychiatric disorders. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2022;42(6):1671–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Blake MJ, Trinder JA, Allen NB. Mechanisms underlying the association between insomnia, anxiety, and depression in adolescence: implications for behavioral sleep interventions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;63:25–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Daut RA, Fonken LK. Circadian regulation of depression: a role for serotonin. Front Neuroendocr. 2019;54:100746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Novati A, Roman V, Cetin T, Hagewoud R, den Boer JA, Luiten PG, et al. Chronically restricted sleep leads to depression-like changes in neurotransmitter receptor sensitivity and neuroendocrine stress reactivity in rats. Sleep. 2008;31(11):1579–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (Application 46478), and was supported by the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2021JCW-08] and the Fundamental-clinical Research Program of the FirstAffiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University [YXJLRH2022027].

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2021JCW-08] and the Fundamental-clinical Research Program of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University [YXJLRH2022027].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Feng Zhang had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Feng Zhang conceptualized and designed the study. All authors contributed in acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. Xuena Yang drafted the manuscript. Feng Zhang helped with critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Chun’e Li and Huijie Zhang performed statistical analysis. Feng Zhang and Bolun Cheng supervised the study and provided administrative, technical, or material support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Cheng, B., Cheng, S. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies candidate genes for sleep disturbances in depressed individuals. Hum Genomics 18, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-024-00609-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-024-00609-5

Keywords